000			04032nam a22004813i 4500
001			EBC3139036
003			MiAaPQ
005			20240729124738.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cnu||||||||
008			240724s2015 xx o ||||0 eng d
020			_a9781943047000 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9781934542460
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC3139036
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL3139036
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr11048898
035			_a(OCoLC)922998715
040			_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ
050		4	_aB2798 -- .A33 2015eb
082	0		_a193
100	1		_aAddison, Daniel.
245	1	0	_aCritique's Contradiction as the Key to Post-Kantianism.
250			_a1st ed.
264		1	_aAurora : _bThe Davies Group, Publishers, _c2015.
264		4	_c©2015.
300			_a1 online resource (218 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
505	0		_aIntro -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Table of Contents -- Founding Epigrams and Thesis Statement -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1) Opening Overview -- 1.2) The New Problem of Affection as the Key to Post-Kantianism -- 1.3) The Critique's Contradiction -- Chapter 2 The Contradicting Syllogisms, Kantian Finitude, and its Other -- 2.1) The Speculative Syllogism -- 2.2) The Reflective Syllogism -- 2.3) Hegel's Critique of Kant's Standpoint of Finitude: a First Sketch -- 2.4) The Ontological Difference between the Standpoints of Kant and the Post-Kantians -- Chapter 3 Longuenesse vs. the Post-Kantians: Longuenesse's Retention of the Critique's Contradiction -- 3.1) Longuenesse's critics and the likeness of Longuenesse and Fichte -- 3.2) The unlikeness of Longuenesse and Fichte (and Beck) -- 3.3) Longuenesse's Solipsism vs. the Post-Kantians' Non-Solipsism -- 3.4) Hegel's Comprehension of Kant's Incomprehensibility -- Chapter 4 The "Collapse" Charge of Allison et al. Vindicated -- 4.1) The Formulaic Vindication of the Charges Laid by Longuenesse's Critics -- 4.2) The Comprehensible Incomprehensibility behind Allison's Difficulty -- 4.3) A Response to "A Response to a Response" -- 4.4) Longuenesse's Attempt to Appropriate Kant's Reflective Theses -- 4.5) Preview of Chapter 6 -- Chapter 5 Reimagining the Debate -- 5.1) One, Two, Three, Four, We Want Finitude No More -- 5.2) Evolving the Debate towards the Question "Kant oder Post-Kantianism?" -- 5.3) Recognizing the Ontological Distinction Need not be Critical-Diagnostic -- 5.4) Longuenesse's Inexplicitness about Finitude -- 5.5) Reimagining Longuenesse: Her Desire for Freedom from Finitude -- 5.6) Back to Reality -- 5.7) Reimagining Allison: His Fear of Flight from Finitude -- Chapter 6 Seeking Coherence, Finding Contradiction -- 6.1) Our Critical-Diagnostic Explanation of (1) and (2).
505	8		_a6.2) Against Two Claims to Coherence Motivating Longuenesse's Account -- 6.3) Critique of Longuenesse's Referent for B160n's"Form of Intuition" -- Notes -- Notes to chapter 1 -- Notes to chapter 2 -- Notes to chapter 3 -- Notes to chapter 4 -- Notes to chapter 5 -- Notes to chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Index.
588			_aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650		0	_aKant, Immanuel, -- 1724-1804.
650		0	_aKant, Immanuel, -- 1724-1804. -- Kritik der reinen Vernunft.
650		0	_aLonguenesse, Béatrice, -- 1950-.
650		0	_aAllison, Henry E.
650		0	_aSensitivity (Personality trait).
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aAddison, Daniel _tCritique's Contradiction as the Key to Post-Kantianism _dAurora : The Davies Group, Publishers,c2015 _z9781934542460
797	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
856	4	0	_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=3139036 _zClick to View
999			_c73148 _d73148