000			04337nam a22004813i 4500
001			EBC3053064
003			MiAaPQ
005			20240729124433.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cnu||||||||
008			240724s2008 xx o ||||0 eng d
020			_a9780199706754 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9780195339765
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC3053064
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL3053064
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr10282182
035			_a(CaONFJC)MIL198069
035			_a(OCoLC)316006042
040			_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ
050		4	_aKF1649.W48 2008
082	0		_a343.73/0721
100	1		_aPitofsky, Robert.
245	1	0	_aHow the Chicago School Overshot the Mark : _bThe Efect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U. S. Antitrust.
250			_a1st ed.
264		1	_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, Incorporated, _c2008.
264		4	_c©2008.
300			_a1 online resource (324 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
505	0		_aIntro -- Contents -- Contributors -- Introduction: Setting the Stage -- 1 Conservative Economic Analysis and Its Effects -- Thoughts on the Chicago Legacy in U.S. Antitrust -- Some Practical Thoughts About Entry -- Conservative Economics and Antitrust: A Variety of Influences -- Influence of Conservative Economic Analysis on the Development of the Law of Antitrust -- On the Foundations of Antitrust Law and Economics -- 2 Is Efficiency All That Counts? -- The Efficiency Paradox -- The Chicago School's Foundation Is Flawed: Antitrust Protects Consumers, Not Efficiency -- 3 Chicago School and Dominant Firm Behavior -- The Harvard and Chicago Schools and the Dominant Firm -- Comment on Herbert Hovenkamp and the Dominant Firm: The Chicago School Has Made Us Too Cautious About False Positives and the Use of Section 2 of the Sherman Act -- 4 Can Vertical Arrangements Injure Consumer Welfare? -- Economic Analysis of Exclusionary Vertical Conduct: Where Chicago Has Overshot the Mark -- Wrong Turns in Exclusive Dealing Law -- 5 Has the Free Rider Explanation for Vertical Arrangements Been Unrealistically Expanded? -- The Sylvania Free Rider Justification for Downstream-Power Vertical Restraints: Truth or Invitation for Pretext? -- Free Riding: An Overstated, and Unconvincing, Explanation for Resale Price Maintenance -- 6 Reinvigorating Merger Enforcement That Has Declined as a Result of Conservative Economic Analysis -- Reinvigorating Horizontal Merger Enforcement -- Appendix -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W.
520			_aA collection of fifteen essays, How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark is about the rise and recent fall of American antitrust. For the past 40 years, U.S. antitrust has been dominated intellectually by an unusually conservative style of economic analysis whose advocates are known as "The Chicago School". A response to that anti-regulation, pro-free-market kind of conservative doctrine may be compiled through collections of scores of articles but until now cannot be found in any one book. The voices contributing to these articles come from across the political spectrum, but virtually all agree that while enforcement today is the better off for this school, examples of extreme interpretations and misinterpretations of conservative economic theory have led American antitrust in the wrong direction.
588			_aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650		0	_aAntitrust law -- Economic aspects -- United States.
650		0	_aAntitrust law -- United States.
650		0	_aCompetition -- United States.
650		0	_aIndustrial concentration -- United States.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aPitofsky, Robert _tHow the Chicago School Overshot the Mark _dOxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c2008 _z9780195339765
797	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
856	4	0	_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=3053064 _zClick to View
999			_c66457 _d66457