000 | 05240nam a22004813i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | EBC3052817 | ||
003 | MiAaPQ | ||
005 | 20240729124430.0 | ||
006 | m o d | | ||
007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
008 | 240724s1998 xx o ||||0 eng d | ||
020 |
_a9780191519093 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 | _z9780198236535 | ||
035 | _a(MiAaPQ)EBC3052817 | ||
035 | _a(Au-PeEL)EBL3052817 | ||
035 | _a(CaPaEBR)ebr10273278 | ||
035 | _a(CaONFJC)MIL197038 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)316196789 | ||
040 |
_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ |
||
050 | 4 | _aB2799.D5 -- L36 1998eb | |
082 | 0 | _a111 | |
100 | 1 | _aLangton, Rae. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aKantian Humility : _bOur Ignorance of Things in Themselves. |
250 | _a1st ed. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aOxford : _bOxford University Press, Incorporated, _c1998. |
|
264 | 4 | _c©1998. | |
300 | _a1 online resource (247 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
505 | 0 | _aIntro -- Contents -- Note on Sources and Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 1. AN OLD PROBLEM -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Allison's Deflationary Proposal -- 3. Reasons for Suspicion -- 4. A Metaphysical Proposal, and an Acid Test Passed -- 2. THREE KANTIAN THESES -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Bennett on Two Distinctions and their Conflation -- 3. A Case For, and Against, the 'Bare Substratum' -- 4. Three Theses: Some Further Texts -- 5. The Distinction -- 6. Humility -- 7. Receptivity -- 3. SUBSTANCE AND PHENOMENAL SUBSTANCE -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Pure Concept of Substance vs. the Schematized -- 3. The Concept of Phenomenal Substance in General -- 4. Matter as a Merely Comparative Subject -- 5. Note on the Inference to Substance -- 6. Concluding Remarks and New Business -- 4. LEIBNIZ AND KANT -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Kant's Version of Leibniz -- 3. A Distinction between Phenomena and Things in Themselves -- 4. A Reduction of Phenomena to Things in Themselves -- 5. Knowledge, via Phenomena, of Things in Themselves -- 6. Kant and Leibniz on Relations -- 5. KANT'S REJECTION OF REDUCIBILITY -- 1. An Early Distinction between Phenomena and Things in Themselves -- 2. The Principle of Succession, and Receptivity -- 3. The Principle of Coexistence, and Irreducibility -- 4. Analysis of the Argument for Irreducibility: Preliminaries -- 5. Irreducibility Argument I -- 6. Irreducibility Argument II -- 7. Concluding Remarks -- 6. FITTING THE PIECES TOGETHER -- 1. Assembly -- 2. An Imaginative Exercise -- 3. Kant, Leibniz, and a Mirror Broken -- 4. Later Signs of the Irreducibility Argument -- 7. A COMPARISON WITH LOCKE -- 1. A Phenomenalist Reading of the Comparison -- 2. Problems, and a Contradiction -- 3. A Different Lockean Distinction -- 4. A Contradiction Dissolved -- 5. A Closer Look -- 8. KANT'S 'PRIMARY' QUALITIES -- 1. Introduction. | |
505 | 8 | _a2. Bennett's Instructive Mistake -- 3. Spatial Features and Space-Filling Features -- 4. A Caveat about Space -- 5. Kant's 'Primary' Qualities: Geometrical and Dynamical -- 6. Solidity vs. Impenetrability, and a Problem for a Contemporary Orthodoxy -- 7. Science: Primary vs. Tertiary Qualities -- 8. Objectivity: Primary vs. Tertiary Qualities -- 9. THE UNOBSERVABLE AND THE SUPERSENSIBLE -- 1. Experience and the Unobservable -- 2. The Kant-Eberhard Controversy: Unobservable vs. Supersensible -- 3. Observability and Community -- 4. Monadology, Well vs. Badly Understood -- 5. Final Comments -- 10. REALISM OR IDEALISM? -- 1. Summing Up -- 2. Idealism: First Impressions -- 3. Idealism: Things in Themselves -- 4. Idealism: Space -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- V -- W. | |
520 | _aRae Langton offers a new interpretation and defence of Kant's doctrine of things in themselves. Kant distinguishes things in themselves from phenomena, and in so doing he makes a metaphysical distinction between intrinsic and relational properties of substances. Langton argues that his claim that we have no knowledge of things in themselves is not idealism, but epistemic humility: we have no knowledge of the intrinsic properties of substances. This interpretation vindicates Kant's scientific realism, and shows his primary/secondary quality distinction to be superior even to modern-day competitors. And it answers the famous charge that Kant's tale of things in themselves is one that makes itself untellable. | ||
588 | _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. | ||
590 | _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. | ||
650 | 0 | _aKant, Immanuel, -- 1724-1804 -- Contributions in doctrine of noumenon or ding an sich. | |
650 | 0 | _aKant, Immanuel, -- 1724-1804. | |
650 | 0 | _aDing an sich. | |
655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aLangton, Rae _tKantian Humility _dOxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated,c1998 _z9780198236535 |
797 | 2 | _aProQuest (Firm) | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=3052817 _zClick to View |
999 |
_c66380 _d66380 |