000 04162nam a22004453i 4500
001 EBC3004432
003 MiAaPQ
005 20240729123941.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cnu||||||||
008 240724s2004 xx o ||||0 eng d
020 _a9780815796374
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z9780815752172
035 _a(MiAaPQ)EBC3004432
035 _a(Au-PeEL)EBL3004432
035 _a(CaPaEBR)ebr10063914
035 _a(OCoLC)55942256
040 _aMiAaPQ
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cMiAaPQ
_dMiAaPQ
050 4 _aHC460.5.L563 2004
082 0 _a337.1/5
100 1 _aLincoln, Edward J.
245 1 0 _aEast Asian Economic Regionalism.
250 _a1st ed.
264 1 _aBlue Ridge Summit :
_bBrookings Institution Press,
_c2004.
264 4 _c©2004.
300 _a1 online resource (305 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
505 0 _aFront Cover -- Inside Flaps -- Title Page -- Copyright Information -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Characteristics of the East Asian Region -- Trade Links -- Investment Links -- Broad Regional Institutions -- The East Asian Alternatives -- More Exclusive Trade Alternatives -- East Asian Monetary Cooperation -- Regional Leadership -- Conclusion and U.S. Policy Recommendations -- Notes -- Index -- Back Cover.
520 _aA Brookings Institution Press and the Council on Foreign Relations publication Something new is happening across East Asia. A region notable for its lack of internal economic links is discussing regional cooperation on trade, investment, and exchange rates. Because of negotiations elsewhere around the globe on regional trade--such as those that led to the consolidation of the European Union, the formation of the North American Free Trade Area, and the rapid proliferation of bilateral free trade areas--the talk is not surprising. Nevertheless, East Asia's past inertia with regard to forming a regional partnership raises many questions about its emerging regionalism. Why has the region suddenly shifted from taking a global approach to economic issues to discussing a regional bloc? How fast and how far will the new regionalism progress? Will the region become a version of the European Union, or something far less? What is the probable impact on American economic and strategic interests--are the likely developments something that the U.S. government should encourage or discourage? Edward Lincoln takes up these questions, exploring what is happening to regional trade and investment flows and what sort of regional arrangements are the most sensible. Lincoln argues that an exclusive grouping is unlikely. Free trade negotiations have brought some economies in the region together, but they also have led to links with nations outside the region. Some regional governments most notably Japan, continue to have difficulty embracing the concept of free trade, even with favored regional partners. In the wake of the Asian financial crisis, governments also have looked at cooperating on exchange rates, but they have done little to move forward. The U.S. government must decide how to respond to these developments in East Asia. An exclusively
520 8 _aAsian form of regionalism could run counter to American economic interests, and the U.S. government has reacted negatively to some of these proposals in the past. Because trade and investment links between the co.
588 _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590 _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650 0 _aEast Asia - Economic conditions.
655 4 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aLincoln, Edward J.
_tEast Asian Economic Regionalism
_dBlue Ridge Summit : Brookings Institution Press,c2004
_z9780815752172
797 2 _aProQuest (Firm)
856 4 0 _uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=3004432
_zClick to View
999 _c57018
_d57018