000 08287nam a22004693i 4500
001 EBC6260206
003 MiAaPQ
005 20240724114404.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cnu||||||||
008 240724s2020 xx o ||||0 eng d
020 _a9788024646169
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z9788024645544
035 _a(MiAaPQ)EBC6260206
035 _a(Au-PeEL)EBL6260206
035 _a(OCoLC)1194531842
040 _aMiAaPQ
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cMiAaPQ
_dMiAaPQ
050 4 _aLA3051 .C476 2020
082 0 _a371.26
100 1 _aČermák, Petr.
245 1 0 _aComplex Words, Causatives, Verbal Periphrases and the Gerund :
_bRomance Languages Versus Czech (a Parallel Corpus-Based Study).
250 _a1st ed.
264 1 _aPrague :
_bKarolinum Press,
_c2020.
264 4 _c©2020.
300 _a1 online resource (163 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
505 0 _aCover -- Contents -- 1. Expressions of potential participation, iterativity, causation, ingressivity and adverbial subordination in the light of parallel corpora (Petr Čermák, Dana Kratochvílová, Olga Nádvorníková, Pavel Štichauer) -- 1.1 Investigation project and its history -- 1.2 Objectives and scope of the present monograph -- 1.3 Organisation of the monograph -- 1.4 Terminological remarks -- 1.4.1 Romance languages under scrutiny and use of the term Romance -- 1.4.2 Use of the terms counterpart and respondent -- 2. Corpus design &amp -- corpus-based contrastive research methodology (Olga Nádvorníková) -- 2.0 Introduction -- 2.1 Corpus-based contrastive research methodology -- 2.2 Corpora used in this study -- 3. Morphologically complex words in Romance and their Czech respondents (Pavel Štichauer, Jan Hricsina, Jiří Jančík, Jaroslava Jindrová, Zuzana Krinková, Daniel Petrík) -- 3.0 Introduction -- 3.1 Word-formation: complex vs simple words -- 3.2 Romance and Czech: common and different word-formation patterns -- 3.3 The typology of Czech respondents -- 3.3.1 Typology of Czech respondents of the adjectives with the suffix -bile/-ble/-vewith the suffix -- 3.3.2 Typology of Czech respondents for verbs with the prefix re-/ri- -- 3.4 The modal suffix -ble/-bile/-vel -- 3.4.1 Data elaboration and analysis -- 3.4.2 Quantitative distribution of the types -- 3.4.3 Discussion of various examples -- 3.5 The iterative prefix re-/ri- -- 3.5.1 Data elaboration and analysis -- 3.5.2 Quantitative distribution of the types -- 3.5.3 Discussion of various examples -- 3.6 Concluding remarks -- 4. Causative constructions in Romance and their Czech respondents (Petr Čermák, Dana Kratochvílová, Petra Laufková, Pavel Štichauer) -- 4.0 Introduction -- 4.1 Definition of causativity and its forms of expression -- 4.2 Causativity in Romance languages.
505 8 _a4.2.1 Analytic type -- 4.2.2 Synthetic type -- 4.2.3 Characteristics of the romance construction hacer/fare/faire/fazer + infinitive -- 4.3 Causativity in Czech -- 4.3.1 Word-formatting causativity -- 4.3.1.1 Verbs derived from another verb -- 4.3.1.2 Verbs derived from an adjective -- 4.3.1.3 No change in the lexical basis, expressing causativity through a prefix roz- -- 4.3.2 Semantic causativity -- 4.3.2.1 Suppletive types -- 4.3.2.2 Causative interpretation resulting from syntax -- 4.3.3 Analytic causativity -- 4.3.3.1 Causative verbs followed by a subordinate clause -- 4.3.3.2 Causative verbs followed by a nominal syntagma -- 4.3.3.3 (Semi-)causative verbs followed by an infinitive -- 4.4 Our typology of Czech respondents -- 4.5 Methodology -- 4.6 Causative constructions in Romance - formal comparison -- 4.7 Analysis of Czech respondents -- 4.7.1 Primary Czech respondents -- 4.7.1.1 Type 3 - shodit type (hacer caer / far cadere / faire tomber / fazer cair) -- 4.7.1.2 Type 8 - what makes you think that &gt -- proč myslíte? ('why do you think that?') -- 4.7.1.3 Type 4 - dát vypít type -- 4.7.2 Secondary Czech respondents -- 4.7.2.1 Type 5 - dohnat k slzám type -- 4.7.2.2 Type 9 - other translation -- 4.7.2.3 Type 7 - způsobit, že tál type -- 4.7.2.4 Type 1 - rozplakat type -- 4.7.2.5 Type 2 - posadit type and type 6 - způsobit tání type -- 4.7.2.6 Type 10 - no translation -- 4.8 Conclusions -- 5. Ingressive periphrases in Romance and their Czech respondents (Dana Kratochvílová, Jaroslava Jindrová, Pavel Štichauer, Eliška Třísková) -- 5.0 Introduction -- 5.1 Verbal periphrases in Romance -- 5.1.1 Approaches to verbal periphrases and the goal of our study -- 5.2 Aspect and Aktionsart -- 5.2.1 Aspect and aktionsart in Romance languages -- 5.2.2 Aspect and aktionsart in Czech -- 5.2.3 Verbal periphrases and the relationship to aspect and aktionsart.
505 8 _a5.2.4 Ingressive MoA -- 5.2.4.1 Initial ingressivity in Romance languages -- 5.2.4.1.1 Derivative ingressive MoA in romance -- 5.2.4.1.2 Analytical ingressive MoA in romance -- 5.2.4.2 Initial ingressivity in Czech -- 5.2.4.2.1 Derivative ingressive MoA in Czech -- 5.2.4.2.2 Analytical ingressive MoA in Czech -- 5.3 Corpus analysis -- 5.3.1 Methodology -- 5.3.2 Results of the corpus analyses -- 5.3.2.1 Ingressive constructions expressing the mere beginning of a process -- 5.3.2.2 Ingressive constructions expressing the beginning of a process and the notion of effort by part of the subject -- 5.3.2.3 Ingressive constructions expressing the beginning of a process and the notions of suddenness and nexpectedness -- 5.3.2.4 Ingressive constructions expressing the beginning of a process and the notions of suddenness, abruptness and previous retention -- 5.3.2.5 Ingressive constructions expressing the beginning of a process and the notions of suddenness, abruptness and vehemence -- 5.4 Concluding remarks -- 6. The Romance gerund and its Czech respondents (Olga Nádvorníková, Leontýna Bratánková, Štěpánka Černikovská, Jan Hricsina) -- 6.0 Introduction -- 6.1 Morphology of the Romance gerund -- 6.2 Romance gerund as a converb -- 6.2.1 Syntactic functions of the romance gerund -- 6.2.2 Semantic interpretation of the (adverbial) Romance gerund -- 6.3 Typology of Czech respondents of the romance gerund -- 6.4 Data elaboration and quantitative analysis of the Romance gerund -- 6.4.1 Factors influencing the frequency of the Romance gerund -- 6.4.2 Syntactic functions of the Romance non-periphrastic gerund -- 6.5 The adverbial Romance gerund and its Czech respondents -- 6.5.1 Semantic types of the Romance adverbial gerund and the Czech transgressive -- 6.5.2 Czech respondents of the Romance gerund -- 6.5.2.1 Finite verbs as respondents of the Romance gerund.
505 8 _a6.5.2.1.1 Coordinate finite clause as a respondent of the Romance gerund -- 6.5.2.1.2 The subordinate finite clause as a respondent of the Romance gerund -- 6.5.2.2 Nominalisations as respondents of the Romance gerund -- 6.5.2.3 Non-finite verb forms as respondents of the Romance gerund -- 6.6 Conclusion -- 7. Formal expressions vs abstract linguistic categories: coming to terms with potential (non-volitional) participation, iterativity, causation, ingressivity and adverbial subordination (Petr Čermák, Dana Kratochvílová, Olga Nádvorníková, Pavel Štichauer) -- 7.0 Introduction -- 7.1 Correspondences of the analysed phenomena across Romance languages -- 7.2 Czech respondents of the analysed phenomena vs systemic counterparts -- 7.3 Exploiting the parallel corpus in search of language universals and abstract categories -- Bibliography.
588 _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590 _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650 0 _aLanguage/Linguistics.
655 4 _aElectronic books.
700 1 _aKratochvílová, Dana.
700 1 _aNádvorníková, Olga.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aČermák, Petr
_tComplex Words, Causatives, Verbal Periphrases and the Gerund
_dPrague : Karolinum Press,c2020
_z9788024645544
797 2 _aProQuest (Firm)
856 4 0 _uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=6260206
_zClick to View
999 _c19180
_d19180