000 | 05103nam a22004933i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | EBC4865462 | ||
003 | MiAaPQ | ||
005 | 20240729131247.0 | ||
006 | m o d | | ||
007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
008 | 240724s2017 xx o ||||0 eng d | ||
020 |
_a9789004337916 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 | _z9789004337909 | ||
035 | _a(MiAaPQ)EBC4865462 | ||
035 | _a(Au-PeEL)EBL4865462 | ||
035 | _a(CaPaEBR)ebr11389957 | ||
035 | _a(CaONFJC)MIL1012311 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)972093466 | ||
040 |
_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ |
||
050 | 4 | _aK2400 .D545 2017 | |
082 | 0 | _a346/.092 | |
100 | 1 | _aDiel-Gligor, Katharina. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTowards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence : _bA Preliminary Ruling System for ICSID Arbitration. |
250 | _a1st ed. | ||
264 | 1 |
_aBoston : _bBRILL, _c2017. |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2017. | |
300 | _a1 online resource (614 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 |
_aNijhoff International Investment Law Series ; _vv.7 |
|
505 | 0 | _aIntro -- Towards Consistency inInternational Investment Jurisprudence: A Preliminary Ruling System for ICSID Arbitration -- Copyright -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- A Subject Area: International Investment Law and Arbitration -- B Central Problem: Inconsistency in International Investment Jurisprudence -- C Central Goal: Targeted, Effective, and Feasible Approach for Reform -- D Research Questions and Hypotheses -- E Research Methods -- F Course of Investigation -- 1 Contextual Framework and Object of Study -- A Preliminary Considerations -- B Contextual Framework: International Investment Law and Arbitration -- I Development of (Inter-) National Investment Law and Policy -- II Development of International Investment Arbitration -- C Object of Study: ICSID Arbitration -- I Basic Information -- II Relative Strengths and Weaknesses: Comparative Law Analysis of ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitration -- III Summary and Evaluation -- D Interim Conclusion -- 2 Problem Analysis: Inconsistency in ICSID Investment Jurisprudence -- A Preliminary Considerations -- I "Consistency" and "Jurisprudence Constante" - Working Definitions and Premises -- II ICSID Jurisprudence in the Focus of Criticism - Rationales -- B Questions of Principle -- I Is Jurisprudential Consistency Desirable at All? -- II Is the Inconsistency Criticism Appropriate at All? -- C Forms of Inconsistencies -- I Same Dispute, but Multiple Proceedings -- II Different Disputes, but Same Legal Issues -- III Temporal Distinction: Parallel vs. Successive Proceedings -- D Causes of Inconsistencies -- I Systemic Causes: Basic Structures of ICSID Arbitration -- II Methodological Causes: Legal Interpretation in ICSID Arbitral Decisions -- E Occurences of Inconsistencies: Qualitative-Empirical Study -- I Law Governing Jurisdiction -- II Procedural Law. | |
505 | 8 | _aIII Substantive Law -- IV Summary and Evaluation -- F Interim Conclusion -- 3 Reform Proposal: Curing Inconsistent ICSID Investment Jurisprudence -- A Preliminary Considerations -- B Overview of Reform Proposals to Enhance Consistency -- I Instruments without ICSID Specificity -- II Instruments with ICSID Specificity -- III Evaluative Choice of the Preferable Instrument -- C Preferable Reform Proposal: Draft of an ICSID Preliminary Ruling System -- I Conceptual Models -- II Legal Implementation -- III Basic Structures -- IV Admissible Questions -- V Submission of Questions -- VI Course of Proceedings -- VII Effect of Preliminary Rulings -- VIII Summary and Evaluation -- D Interim Conclusion -- Conclusion -- A Final Summary -- B Research Questions and Hypotheses: Answers and Confirmations -- C Prospects and Outlook -- Summary in German -- Annex -- A Annex to Chapter 1 -- B Annex to Chapter 2 -- C Annex to Chapter 3 -- Table of Cases -- Bibliography -- Index. | |
520 | _aIn Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence, Katharina Diel-Gligor addresses the problem of inconsistent arbitral decision-making, with a focus on ICSID arbitration. After analysing the causes, forms, and manifestations of inconsistencies, she proposes a preliminary ruling system as a means of reform. | ||
588 | _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. | ||
590 | _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. | ||
650 | 0 | _aInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. | |
650 | 0 | _aInternational commercial arbitration. | |
655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aDiel-Gligor, Katharina _tTowards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence _dBoston : BRILL,c2017 _z9789004337909 |
797 | 2 | _aProQuest (Firm) | |
830 | 0 | _aNijhoff International Investment Law Series | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4865462 _zClick to View |
999 |
_c126553 _d126553 |