000 05103nam a22004933i 4500
001 EBC4865462
003 MiAaPQ
005 20240729131247.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cnu||||||||
008 240724s2017 xx o ||||0 eng d
020 _a9789004337916
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z9789004337909
035 _a(MiAaPQ)EBC4865462
035 _a(Au-PeEL)EBL4865462
035 _a(CaPaEBR)ebr11389957
035 _a(CaONFJC)MIL1012311
035 _a(OCoLC)972093466
040 _aMiAaPQ
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cMiAaPQ
_dMiAaPQ
050 4 _aK2400 .D545 2017
082 0 _a346/.092
100 1 _aDiel-Gligor, Katharina.
245 1 0 _aTowards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence :
_bA Preliminary Ruling System for ICSID Arbitration.
250 _a1st ed.
264 1 _aBoston :
_bBRILL,
_c2017.
264 4 _c©2017.
300 _a1 online resource (614 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aNijhoff International Investment Law Series ;
_vv.7
505 0 _aIntro -- Towards Consistency inInternational Investment Jurisprudence: A Preliminary Ruling System for ICSID Arbitration -- Copyright -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- A Subject Area: International Investment Law and Arbitration -- B Central Problem: Inconsistency in International Investment Jurisprudence -- C Central Goal: Targeted, Effective, and Feasible Approach for Reform -- D Research Questions and Hypotheses -- E Research Methods -- F Course of Investigation -- 1 Contextual Framework and Object of Study -- A Preliminary Considerations -- B Contextual Framework: International Investment Law and Arbitration -- I Development of (Inter-) National Investment Law and Policy -- II Development of International Investment Arbitration -- C Object of Study: ICSID Arbitration -- I Basic Information -- II Relative Strengths and Weaknesses: Comparative Law Analysis of ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitration -- III Summary and Evaluation -- D Interim Conclusion -- 2 Problem Analysis: Inconsistency in ICSID Investment Jurisprudence -- A Preliminary Considerations -- I "Consistency" and "Jurisprudence Constante" - Working Definitions and Premises -- II ICSID Jurisprudence in the Focus of Criticism - Rationales -- B Questions of Principle -- I Is Jurisprudential Consistency Desirable at All? -- II Is the Inconsistency Criticism Appropriate at All? -- C Forms of Inconsistencies -- I Same Dispute, but Multiple Proceedings -- II Different Disputes, but Same Legal Issues -- III Temporal Distinction: Parallel vs. Successive Proceedings -- D Causes of Inconsistencies -- I Systemic Causes: Basic Structures of ICSID Arbitration -- II Methodological Causes: Legal Interpretation in ICSID Arbitral Decisions -- E Occurences of Inconsistencies: Qualitative-Empirical Study -- I Law Governing Jurisdiction -- II Procedural Law.
505 8 _aIII Substantive Law -- IV Summary and Evaluation -- F Interim Conclusion -- 3 Reform Proposal: Curing Inconsistent ICSID Investment Jurisprudence -- A Preliminary Considerations -- B Overview of Reform Proposals to Enhance Consistency -- I Instruments without ICSID Specificity -- II Instruments with ICSID Specificity -- III Evaluative Choice of the Preferable Instrument -- C Preferable Reform Proposal: Draft of an ICSID Preliminary Ruling System -- I Conceptual Models -- II Legal Implementation -- III Basic Structures -- IV Admissible Questions -- V Submission of Questions -- VI Course of Proceedings -- VII Effect of Preliminary Rulings -- VIII Summary and Evaluation -- D Interim Conclusion -- Conclusion -- A Final Summary -- B Research Questions and Hypotheses: Answers and Confirmations -- C Prospects and Outlook -- Summary in German -- Annex -- A Annex to Chapter 1 -- B Annex to Chapter 2 -- C Annex to Chapter 3 -- Table of Cases -- Bibliography -- Index.
520 _aIn Towards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence, Katharina Diel-Gligor addresses the problem of inconsistent arbitral decision-making, with a focus on ICSID arbitration. After analysing the causes, forms, and manifestations of inconsistencies, she proposes a preliminary ruling system as a means of reform.
588 _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590 _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650 0 _aInternational Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
650 0 _aInternational commercial arbitration.
655 4 _aElectronic books.
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aDiel-Gligor, Katharina
_tTowards Consistency in International Investment Jurisprudence
_dBoston : BRILL,c2017
_z9789004337909
797 2 _aProQuest (Firm)
830 0 _aNijhoff International Investment Law Series
856 4 0 _uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4865462
_zClick to View
999 _c126553
_d126553