000			04257nam a22004693i 4500
001			EBC4551705
003			MiAaPQ
005			20240729130547.0
006			m o d |
007			cr cnu||||||||
008			240724s2015 xx o ||||0 eng d
020			_a9780231540278 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_z9780231175647
035			_a(MiAaPQ)EBC4551705
035			_a(Au-PeEL)EBL4551705
035			_a(CaPaEBR)ebr11386948
035			_a(OCoLC)988176388
040			_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ
050		4	_aDS62.8.Y66 2016
082	0		_a956.04
100	1		_aYom, Sean.
245	1	0	_aFrom Resilience to Revolution : _bHow Foreign Interventions Destabilize the Middle East.
250			_a1st ed.
264		1	_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c2015.
264		4	_c©2015.
300			_a1 online resource (311 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aColumbia Studies in Middle East Politics
505	0		_aIntro -- Table of Contents -- A Note on Transliteration and Interviews -- Acknowledgments -- 1. The Argument and the Cases -- 2. Coalitions, State-Building, and Geopolitical Mediation -- 3. Conflict and Compromise in Kuwait -- 4. Inclusion and Stability in a Populist Autocracy -- 5. Cliency and Coercion in Iran -- 6. Exclusionary Politics and the Revolutionary End -- 7. A Conflict Interrupted in Jordan -- 8. Recurrent Tensions and Tenuous Survival Under Hashemite Rule -- 9. The Geopolitical Origins of Durable Political Order -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index.
520			_aAs colonial rule dissolved in the 1930s and 1950s, Middle Eastern autocrats constructed new political states to solidify their reigns, with varying results. Some proved durable despite economic challenges and devastating wars, such as the Sabah regime of Kuwait, which faced little opposition and enjoyed mass support. Others such as the Hashemite monarchy of Jordan barely survived the twentieth century, tested repeatedly by uprisings from within and pressures from beyond. Still others were deposed through revolutionary upheavals as popular forces mobilized to overthrow their despotic reign, as with the Pahlavi dynasty of Iran. Why did equally ambitious authoritarians meet such unequal fates? Sean L. Yom makes a bold, singular claim: the durability of Middle Eastern regimes stems from their geopolitical origins. At the dawn of the postcolonial era, many autocratic states across the region had little support from their own societies and struggled to overcome widespread opposition. When foreign powers intervened to prop these regimes up, they unwittingly sabotaged the prospects for long-term stability by discouraging triumphant leaders from reaching out to their people and bargaining for mass support—early coalitional decisions that created repressive institutions and planted the seeds for future unrest. Only when they were secluded from larger geopolitical machinations did Middle Eastern regimes come to grips with their weaknesses and build broader coalitions. Based on comparative historical analyses of Iran, Jordan, and Kuwait, Yom examines the foreign interventions, coalitional choices, and state outcomes that characterize the modern Middle East. A key text for foreign policy scholars, From Resilience to Revolution shows how outside interference can corrupt the most basic choices of governance: who to reward, who to punish, who to compensate, and
520	8		_awho to manipulate.
588			_aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.
590			_aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.
650		0	_aPolitical stability - Middle East - History - 20th century.
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aYom, Sean _tFrom Resilience to Revolution _dNew York : Columbia University Press,c2015 _z9780231175647
797	2		_aProQuest (Firm)
830		0	_aColumbia Studies in Middle East Politics
856	4	0	_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4551705 _zClick to View
999			_c111956 _d111956