| 000 | 05039nam a22005053i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EBC4439564 | ||
| 003 | MiAaPQ | ||
| 005 | 20240729130340.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | | ||
| 007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
| 008 | 240724s2016 xx o ||||0 eng d | ||
| 020 |
_a9781442259195 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 | _z9781442259188 | ||
| 035 | _a(MiAaPQ)EBC4439564 | ||
| 035 | _a(Au-PeEL)EBL4439564 | ||
| 035 | _a(CaPaEBR)ebr11170961 | ||
| 035 | _a(CaONFJC)MIL902334 | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)945136058 | ||
| 040 |
_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ |
||
| 050 | 4 | _aUA23 -- .H86 2016eb | |
| 100 | 1 | _aEllman, Jesse. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDefense Acquisition Trends 2015 : _bAcquisition in the Era of Budgetary Constraints. |
| 250 | _a1st ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aBlue Ridge Summit : _bCenter for Strategic & International Studies, _c2016. |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2016. | |
| 300 | _a1 online resource (115 pages) | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 | _aCSIS Reports | |
| 505 | 0 | _aDefense Acquisition Trends, 2015 -- Contents -- Figures -- Tables -- Executive Summary -- What Is DoD Buying? -- Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy -- A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline -- Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient -- How Is DoD Buying? -- Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results -- Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition -- Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data -- Whom Is DoD Buying From? -- Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014 -- The Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R& -- D Contract Obligations -- The Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation -- DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley -- What Are the Defense Components Buying? -- Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways -- Army -- Navy -- Air Force -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1. Report Organization -- 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context -- 2. What Is DoD Buying? -- 2.1. Innovation, R& -- D, and Technological Superiority -- 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy" -- 2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation -- 2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown -- 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio -- 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account -- 2.3.1. Procurement -- 2.3.2. Operations & -- Maintenance -- 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation -- 3. How Is DoD Buying It? -- 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System -- 3.1.1. Better Buying Power -- 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act -- 3.2. Contract and Fee Type. | |
| 505 | 8 | _a3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition -- 3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines -- 3.4.1. Terminations -- 3.4.2. Change Orders -- 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From? -- 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base -- 4.1.1. Army -- 4.1.2. Navy -- 4.1.3. Air Force -- 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency -- 4.1.5. Products -- 4.1.6. Services -- 4.1.7. Research and Development -- 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry -- 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors -- 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors -- 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors -- 4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base -- 4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base -- 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below -- 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP -- 4.3.4. Implications for the Future -- 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying? -- 5.1. Army -- 5.2. Navy -- 5.3. Air Force -- 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency -- 5.5. Missile Defense Agency -- 5.6. Other DoD -- 6. Conclusion -- Appendix A: Methodology -- About the Authors. | |
| 520 | _aThis study examines contracting trends at the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). It relies on empirical analysis of DoD contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). | ||
| 588 | _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. | ||
| 590 | _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aUnited States--Armed Forces--Procurement. | |
| 655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aHunter, Andrew P. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aMcCormick, Rhys. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aSanders, Gregory. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aEllman, Jesse _tDefense Acquisition Trends 2015 _dBlue Ridge Summit : Center for Strategic & International Studies,c2016 _z9781442259188 |
| 797 | 2 | _aProQuest (Firm) | |
| 830 | 0 | _aCSIS Reports | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4439564 _zClick to View |
| 999 |
_c107514 _d107514 |
||