Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems : Process and Substance.

Intro -- Foreword -- Contents -- Contributors -- Table of Cases -- Table of Legislation -- 1. Introduction -- I. The Chapters -- II. Acknowledgements -- 2. Public Reason and Administrative Legitimacy -- I. Introduction -- II. Public Reason and its Critics -- III. Why Public Reason is Necessary -- IV. Triumph and Tragedy of Administrative Rationality -- 3. Administrative Law: A Values-based Approach -- I. Introduction -- II. Administrative Law Values -- III. Values and Doctrinal Rules -- IV. Institutional Considerations -- V. Conclusion -- 4. The Public Interest Conception of Public Law: Its Procedural Origins and Substantive Implications -- I. Introduction -- II. Public Interest Conception -- III. Legacy of the Public Interest Conception -- IV. Conclusions -- 5. Process, Substance and the History of Error of Law Review -- I. Introduction -- II. Development of Certiorari to Quash -- III. Evidence in Certiorari Proceedings -- IV. Certiorari, Affidavits and the Concept of Jurisdiction -- V. Twentieth-century Developments in Error of Law Review -- VI. Re-evaluating the Distinction Between Jurisdictional and Non-Jurisdictional Errors of Law -- VII. Conclusion -- 6. The Growth of Substantive Review: The Changes, their Causes and their Consequences -- I. Introduction -- II. Process, Substance and Quality -- III. Expansion of Substantive Review -- IV. Judicial Review's Mission Creep -- V. Some Reasons for Expansion -- VI. Possible Consequences of Expanding Substantive Review -- VII. Conclusions -- 7. 'Blasphemy Against Basics': Doctrine, Conceptual Reasoning and Certain Decisions of the UK Supreme Court -- I. Invention of the Common Law -- II. The Law as the Judge's Only Master -- III. What are 'Like Cases'? -- IV. The Inevitability of Injustice -- V. Minerva's Preference for Certainty.

VI. Judicial Review of the Upper Tribunal: Is the Law the Master in the Supreme Court? -- VII. Malleable Boundary Between Law and Fact -- VIII. Finding a Hook -- IX. An Alternative View: Fidelity to Doctrine -- X. Concluding Remarks -- 8. The Legitimacy of Expectations About Fairness: Can Process and Substance be Untangled? -- I. Introduction -- II. Modern Expansion of the Duty to Act Fairly -- III. Reasons for Fairness -- IV. Expectations, Estoppel and Fairness -- V. Rejection of Estoppel in Australian Public Law -- VI. Conclusion -- 9. Judicial Review of Delegated Legislation: Why Favour Substantive Review over Procedural Review? -- I. Introduction -- II. Review of Delegated Legislation: Legitimacy Questions -- III. Procedural Review -- IV. Substantive Review -- V. Options for Correcting the Imbalance -- VI. Conclusion -- 10. Transubstantiation in Canadian Public Law: Processing Substance and Instantiating Process -- I. Introduction -- II. Signifying Problems: Process Versus Substance in General Jurisprudence and in Public Law -- III. Cross-FertiliSation of Process and Substance: Procedural Fairness as the First Fault-Line -- IV. Expecting Legitimacy: The Duty to Consult and Accommodate as the Second Fault-Line -- V. Consubstantiating Process and Substance: Review of Discretionary Decisions as the Third Fault-Line -- VI. Conclusion: Rites of Transubstantiating Process and Substance -- 11. Is Judicial Review Qualitative? -- I. Introduction -- II. Perspective -- III. Essence of Common Law Judicial Review -- IV. Concepts -- V. Categories -- VI. Conclusion -- 12. Remedies for Laws that Violate Human Rights -- I. Introduction -- II. Strong Judicial Review? The American Reliance on ' as Applied' Declarations of Invalidity -- III. Strong Judicial Review? The Canadian and South African Experiences with Suspended Declarations of Invalidity.

IV. Weak Judicial Review? The British Experience with Remedial Interpretative Remedies and Declarations of Incompatibility -- V. An Ideal Approach to Remedies for Laws that Violate Human Rights -- VI. Conclusion -- 13.'Striking Back' and 'Clamping Down': An Alternative Perspective on Judicial Review -- I. Introduction -- II. Westminster at Home -- III. Westminster in Europe -- IV. Conclusion -- 14. The Use and Effects of Judicial Review: Assumptions and the Empirical Evidence -- I. Introduction -- II. Evidence Base for Reforming Judicial Review -- III. First Assumption: Growth in the Use of Judicial Review has been Driven by Abuse -- IV. Second Assumption: Judicial Review has a Negative Effect on Public Administration -- V. Third Assumption: Judicial Review Does Not Provide Effective Redress -- VI. Conclusions -- 15. Common Law Public Law: Some Comparative Reflections -- I. Introduction -- II. Shared Foundations -- III. Divergence -- IV. Unity in Diversity -- V. Conclusions -- 16. Comparison, Realism and Theory in Public Law -- I. The Job of Public Law -- II. Values -- III. Who Decides? -- IV. Theory and Comparison? -- V. Conclusion -- Index.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.