ORPP logo
Image from Google Jackets

Agency and Deontic Logic.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Oxford : Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2001Copyright date: ©2001Edition: 1st edDescription: 1 online resource (205 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780198030768
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Agency and Deontic LogicDDC classification:
  • 170.42
LOC classification:
  • BC145.H67
Online resources:
Contents:
Intro -- Contents -- 1 Overview -- 2 Indeterminism and agency -- 2.1 Branching time -- 2.1.1 Frames and models -- 2.1.2 Propositions -- 2.2 Individual agency -- 2.2.1 Agents and choices -- 2.2.2 Stit operators -- 2.2.3 Some logical considerations -- 2.3 Individual ability -- 2.3.1 Kenny's objections -- 2.3.2 Brown's theory -- 2.3.3 Refraining and ability -- 2.4 Group agency and ability -- 2.4.1 Group actions -- 2.4.2 A group agency operator -- 3 Ought to be -- 3.1 The standard theory -- 3.2 A utilitarian theory -- 3.2.1 General models -- 3.2.2 Utilitarian models -- 3.2.3 Logic of the utilitarian ought -- 3.3 The Meinong/Chisholm analysis -- 3.3.1 The analysis -- 3.3.2 Some logical features -- 3.4 Evaluating the analysis -- 3.4.1 Agency in the complement -- 3.4.2 The gambling problem -- 4 Ought to do -- 4.1 Dominance -- 4.1.1 Ordering the propositions -- 4.1.2 A sure-thing argument -- 4.1.3 Ordering the actions -- 4.2 Dominance act utilitarianism -- 4.2.1 Optimal actions -- 4.2.2 The finite choice condition -- 4.3 A new deontic operator -- 4.3.1 The definition -- 4.3.2 Deontic logic and act utilitarianism -- 4.3.3 Logic of the dominance ought -- 4.4 Independence -- 4.4.1 Independence and conditionals -- 4.4.2 Conditionals and sure-thing reasoning -- 4.4.3 Refining the analysis -- 5 Conditional oughts -- 5.1 Conditionally optimal actions -- 5.2 A conditional ought operator -- 5.2.1 The definition -- 5.2.2 Some logical considerations -- 5.3 Two patterns of argument -- 5.3.1 The action argument -- 5.3.2 The ought argument -- 5.4 Orthodox act utilitarianism -- 5.4.1 An example -- 5.4.2 The definition -- 5.4.3 An orthodox deontic operator -- 6 Group oughts -- 6.1 Optimal group actions -- 6.2 Individual and group act utilitarianism -- 6.3 Deontic operators for group oughts -- 6.3.1 Definitions -- 6.3.2 Some logical points -- 6.4 Rule utilitarianism.
6.4.1 Formulating the theory -- 6.4.2 Act and rule utilitarianism -- 7 Strategic oughts -- 7.1 Strategies -- 7.1.1 Basic ideas -- 7.1.2 Limiting the range -- 7.2 Strategies and choices -- 7.2.1 Agency -- 7.2.2 Ability -- 7.3 Strategic dominance and optimality -- 7.3.1 Dominance -- 7.3.2 Optimality -- 7.4 A strategic ought operator -- 7.4.1 The definition -- 7.4.2 Logical points -- 7.4.3 Actualism and possibilism -- A: Proofs of validities and propositions -- A.1 Validities -- A.2 Propositions -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Z.
Summary: This original new work develops deontic logic against the background of a theory of agency in indeterministic time. The goal is to present a formal account of what individuals and groups of agents ought to do under various conditions and over extended periods of time.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Intro -- Contents -- 1 Overview -- 2 Indeterminism and agency -- 2.1 Branching time -- 2.1.1 Frames and models -- 2.1.2 Propositions -- 2.2 Individual agency -- 2.2.1 Agents and choices -- 2.2.2 Stit operators -- 2.2.3 Some logical considerations -- 2.3 Individual ability -- 2.3.1 Kenny's objections -- 2.3.2 Brown's theory -- 2.3.3 Refraining and ability -- 2.4 Group agency and ability -- 2.4.1 Group actions -- 2.4.2 A group agency operator -- 3 Ought to be -- 3.1 The standard theory -- 3.2 A utilitarian theory -- 3.2.1 General models -- 3.2.2 Utilitarian models -- 3.2.3 Logic of the utilitarian ought -- 3.3 The Meinong/Chisholm analysis -- 3.3.1 The analysis -- 3.3.2 Some logical features -- 3.4 Evaluating the analysis -- 3.4.1 Agency in the complement -- 3.4.2 The gambling problem -- 4 Ought to do -- 4.1 Dominance -- 4.1.1 Ordering the propositions -- 4.1.2 A sure-thing argument -- 4.1.3 Ordering the actions -- 4.2 Dominance act utilitarianism -- 4.2.1 Optimal actions -- 4.2.2 The finite choice condition -- 4.3 A new deontic operator -- 4.3.1 The definition -- 4.3.2 Deontic logic and act utilitarianism -- 4.3.3 Logic of the dominance ought -- 4.4 Independence -- 4.4.1 Independence and conditionals -- 4.4.2 Conditionals and sure-thing reasoning -- 4.4.3 Refining the analysis -- 5 Conditional oughts -- 5.1 Conditionally optimal actions -- 5.2 A conditional ought operator -- 5.2.1 The definition -- 5.2.2 Some logical considerations -- 5.3 Two patterns of argument -- 5.3.1 The action argument -- 5.3.2 The ought argument -- 5.4 Orthodox act utilitarianism -- 5.4.1 An example -- 5.4.2 The definition -- 5.4.3 An orthodox deontic operator -- 6 Group oughts -- 6.1 Optimal group actions -- 6.2 Individual and group act utilitarianism -- 6.3 Deontic operators for group oughts -- 6.3.1 Definitions -- 6.3.2 Some logical points -- 6.4 Rule utilitarianism.

6.4.1 Formulating the theory -- 6.4.2 Act and rule utilitarianism -- 7 Strategic oughts -- 7.1 Strategies -- 7.1.1 Basic ideas -- 7.1.2 Limiting the range -- 7.2 Strategies and choices -- 7.2.1 Agency -- 7.2.2 Ability -- 7.3 Strategic dominance and optimality -- 7.3.1 Dominance -- 7.3.2 Optimality -- 7.4 A strategic ought operator -- 7.4.1 The definition -- 7.4.2 Logical points -- 7.4.3 Actualism and possibilism -- A: Proofs of validities and propositions -- A.1 Validities -- A.2 Propositions -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Z.

This original new work develops deontic logic against the background of a theory of agency in indeterministic time. The goal is to present a formal account of what individuals and groups of agents ought to do under various conditions and over extended periods of time.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 Resource Centre. All rights reserved.