The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals : The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory?

Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- i The Relevance of the Host State Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: Revival of the Localisation Theory? -- ii Questions and Arguments -- iii Structure -- iv Essential Concepts -- A Applicable Law -- B Domestic Law -- v Approach and Sources -- A General Approach -- B Interpretive Approach -- C Sources -- Part 1 The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of an Investment Treaty Tribunal -- Chapter 1 The Role of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations in General -- Introduction -- Section One: General Remarks with Regard to the Application of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations -- A The Reason for the Importance of Host State Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations -- B The Guise in Which Domestic Law Applies in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: As Fact or as Law? -- C The Legal Grounds of the Application of Domestic Law as Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations -- a The Parties Have Expressly or Impliedly Chosen Domestic Law to Govern a Particular Issue -- b The Nature of the Legal Issue -- D The Irrelevance of the Applicable Law Provision in Investment Treaties and the icsid Convention -- Section Two: The Situations in Which an Investment Treaty Tribunal Has to Refer to Domestic Laws -- A The Role of Domestic Law in Jurisdictional Issues -- a Jurisdiction ratione materiae -- i The Legality of Investment -- ii Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- iii Approval of Investments -- b Jurisdiction ratione personae -- B The Role of Domestic Law in Issues Concerning Merits -- a Domestic Law as Fact in Issues Concerning Merits -- b Domestic Law as Law in Issues Concerning Merits.

i Express Treaty Reference to the Application of Domestic Law as Law -- ii Contractual Claims -- Section Three: Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods and Means -- A Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods -- B Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Means -- C Conclusion on the Methods and Means of Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law -- Conclusion -- Introduction to Chapters 2 &amp -- 3: The Role of Domestic Law in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals -- Chapter 2 Application of Domestic Law to the Legality Requirement -- Section One: The Legal Bases for Referring to the Laws of the Host State -- A Agreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty -- a Express Agreement of the Treaty Contracting Parties -- i Varying Formulations and Its Impact -- ii Varying Locations and Its Impact -- 1st In "Definitions" Clauses -- 2nd In "Scope of Application" Clauses -- 3rd In Substantive Protection Clauses -- b Implicit Reference -- B The Nature of the Legal Issue -- C Relying on Principles of International Law for Dismissing Illegal Investments -- Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Legality Requirement -- A The Scope of the Legality Requirement -- a The Formal Scope of the Legality Requirement -- b The Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement -- i Approaches Adopted in Investment Treaty Arbitrations -- 1st Subject-Matter Approach (Compliance Only with Laws Relating to Foreign Investment) -- 2nd Significance-Analysis Approach (Compliance Only with Fundamental Laws of the Host State) -- 3rd Combined-Effect Analysis (Manifold Analysis of the Significance of the Host State Law Violated and the Behaviour of the Investor as Impacting Host State's Public Interest).

ii The Proposed Solution Regarding the Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement -- 1st Treaty Interpretation Observations -- 2nd The Proposed Framework of the Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement -- - Violation of de minimis Laws of the Host State -- - Violation of "Fundamental Laws" of the Host State -- - Attempts to Circumscribe the Reach of the Term "Fundamental Laws" -- - The Proper Approach to Circumscribe the Reach of the Term "Fundamental Laws" -- - Constitutional Laws -- - Organic Laws -- - Mandatory Rules of Law -- c Temporal Scope of the Legality Requirement -- d Conclusions on the Scope of the Legality Requirement -- B The Consequences of the Application of the Legality Requirement -- a General and Specific Consequences of the Legality Requirement -- i General Consequence of Illegality -- ii Specific Consequence of Illegality -- iii The Missing Jurisdictional Condition -- b Possible Defences by Investors -- i Object and Purpose of the Underlying Investment Treaty -- ii The Involvement of the Host State -- 1st Knowledge of the State -- 2nd Involvement of the Host State in the Corruption -- 3rd Investor's Good Faith -- Conclusion -- Chapter 3 Application of Domestic Law to Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- Introduction -- Section One: The Applicable Law to the Question of Determining the Meaning, Scope, and the Legal Bearings of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- A Agreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty -- a Express Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty -- b Implied Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty -- B The Nature of the Legal Issue -- C Conclusion.

Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- A The General Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- B The Specific Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment -- a Definition of Property -- b Conditions for Transfer of Title -- c Conditions for Protection of Contractual Rights -- Conclusion -- Part 2 The Revival of the Localisation Theory in Light of the Developments in Investment Treaty Law -- Introduction to Chapters 4 &amp -- 5 -- Chapter 4 The Localisation Theory: Roots, Premises, and Its Legal Destiny -- Introduction -- Section One: Classic State-centric Theories: The Calvo Doctrine and the Localisation Theory -- Section Two: The Emergence of Bilateral Investment Treaties -- Conclusion -- Chapter 5 Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory in the Field of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Current Role of Host State Law and Host State Court -- Introduction -- Section One: The Current Role of Host State Law -- A A Distillation of Chapters 1-3 Regarding the Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of an Investment Treaty Tribunal -- B Developments in Investment Treaty Law Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases -- a Developments in Investment Treaty Rulemaking Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases -- i Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Indian Model Investment Treaties -- ii Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Dutch Model Investment Treaties.

b Developments in Investment Treaty Jurisprudence Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases -- Conclusion -- Section Two: The Current Role of Host State Court -- A Recourse to Local Remedies for a Defined Period as a Precondition of Filing the Case before International Investment Arbitration -- B Recourse to Host State Court as a Prerequisite of the Establishment of the Violation of Investment Treaty Standards -- C Recourse to Host State Court's Determinations as a Point of Reference for Clarifying Preliminary Points of the Domestic Law -- a The Interplay between Investment Treaty Tribunal and Host State Court in Substantive Matters -- b Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals with Regard to the Weight and Value of Host State Court's Determinations in International Proceedings -- c Concerns over the Legitimacy of Host State Court's Determinations -- d Proposed Solutions to the Legitimacy Concerns -- D Recourse to Host State Court as an Investment Dispute Settlement Venue -- a Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes upon the Irreversible Choice by the Investor: Fork-in-the-road Clauses -- b Host State Court as an Alternative Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes -- c Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes -- d Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of Certain Investment Disputes -- Conclusion -- Final Conclusion -- Sources -- Cases -- Bibliography -- Books -- Articles -- Reports -- International Conventions, Treaties, and International Instruments -- Bilateral Investment Treaties -- Model bit s -- Treaties with Investment Provisions -- International Conventions -- UN General Assembly Documents -- Other International Instruments.

Index.

The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic law's essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction, and in light of the broader functions of host state law and host state courts, the author argues that the dormant "localisation" theory has been partially revived in contemporary investment treaty law.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.