ORPP logo
Image from Google Jackets

Critique's Contradiction as the Key to Post-Kantianism.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Aurora : The Davies Group, Publishers, 2015Copyright date: ©2015Edition: 1st edDescription: 1 online resource (218 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781943047000
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Critique's Contradiction as the Key to Post-KantianismDDC classification:
  • 193
LOC classification:
  • B2798 -- .A33 2015eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Intro -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Table of Contents -- Founding Epigrams and Thesis Statement -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1) Opening Overview -- 1.2) The New Problem of Affection as the Key to Post-Kantianism -- 1.3) The Critique's Contradiction -- Chapter 2 The Contradicting Syllogisms, Kantian Finitude, and its Other -- 2.1) The Speculative Syllogism -- 2.2) The Reflective Syllogism -- 2.3) Hegel's Critique of Kant's Standpoint of Finitude: a First Sketch -- 2.4) The Ontological Difference between the Standpoints of Kant and the Post-Kantians -- Chapter 3 Longuenesse vs. the Post-Kantians: Longuenesse's Retention of the Critique's Contradiction -- 3.1) Longuenesse's critics and the likeness of Longuenesse and Fichte -- 3.2) The unlikeness of Longuenesse and Fichte (and Beck) -- 3.3) Longuenesse's Solipsism vs. the Post-Kantians' Non-Solipsism -- 3.4) Hegel's Comprehension of Kant's Incomprehensibility -- Chapter 4 The "Collapse" Charge of Allison et al. Vindicated -- 4.1) The Formulaic Vindication of the Charges Laid by Longuenesse's Critics -- 4.2) The Comprehensible Incomprehensibility behind Allison's Difficulty -- 4.3) A Response to "A Response to a Response" -- 4.4) Longuenesse's Attempt to Appropriate Kant's Reflective Theses -- 4.5) Preview of Chapter 6 -- Chapter 5 Reimagining the Debate -- 5.1) One, Two, Three, Four, We Want Finitude No More -- 5.2) Evolving the Debate towards the Question "Kant oder Post-Kantianism?" -- 5.3) Recognizing the Ontological Distinction Need not be Critical-Diagnostic -- 5.4) Longuenesse's Inexplicitness about Finitude -- 5.5) Reimagining Longuenesse: Her Desire for Freedom from Finitude -- 5.6) Back to Reality -- 5.7) Reimagining Allison: His Fear of Flight from Finitude -- Chapter 6 Seeking Coherence, Finding Contradiction -- 6.1) Our Critical-Diagnostic Explanation of (1) and (2).
6.2) Against Two Claims to Coherence Motivating Longuenesse's Account -- 6.3) Critique of Longuenesse's Referent for B160n's"Form of Intuition" -- Notes -- Notes to chapter 1 -- Notes to chapter 2 -- Notes to chapter 3 -- Notes to chapter 4 -- Notes to chapter 5 -- Notes to chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Index.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Intro -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Table of Contents -- Founding Epigrams and Thesis Statement -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- 1.1) Opening Overview -- 1.2) The New Problem of Affection as the Key to Post-Kantianism -- 1.3) The Critique's Contradiction -- Chapter 2 The Contradicting Syllogisms, Kantian Finitude, and its Other -- 2.1) The Speculative Syllogism -- 2.2) The Reflective Syllogism -- 2.3) Hegel's Critique of Kant's Standpoint of Finitude: a First Sketch -- 2.4) The Ontological Difference between the Standpoints of Kant and the Post-Kantians -- Chapter 3 Longuenesse vs. the Post-Kantians: Longuenesse's Retention of the Critique's Contradiction -- 3.1) Longuenesse's critics and the likeness of Longuenesse and Fichte -- 3.2) The unlikeness of Longuenesse and Fichte (and Beck) -- 3.3) Longuenesse's Solipsism vs. the Post-Kantians' Non-Solipsism -- 3.4) Hegel's Comprehension of Kant's Incomprehensibility -- Chapter 4 The "Collapse" Charge of Allison et al. Vindicated -- 4.1) The Formulaic Vindication of the Charges Laid by Longuenesse's Critics -- 4.2) The Comprehensible Incomprehensibility behind Allison's Difficulty -- 4.3) A Response to "A Response to a Response" -- 4.4) Longuenesse's Attempt to Appropriate Kant's Reflective Theses -- 4.5) Preview of Chapter 6 -- Chapter 5 Reimagining the Debate -- 5.1) One, Two, Three, Four, We Want Finitude No More -- 5.2) Evolving the Debate towards the Question "Kant oder Post-Kantianism?" -- 5.3) Recognizing the Ontological Distinction Need not be Critical-Diagnostic -- 5.4) Longuenesse's Inexplicitness about Finitude -- 5.5) Reimagining Longuenesse: Her Desire for Freedom from Finitude -- 5.6) Back to Reality -- 5.7) Reimagining Allison: His Fear of Flight from Finitude -- Chapter 6 Seeking Coherence, Finding Contradiction -- 6.1) Our Critical-Diagnostic Explanation of (1) and (2).

6.2) Against Two Claims to Coherence Motivating Longuenesse's Account -- 6.3) Critique of Longuenesse's Referent for B160n's"Form of Intuition" -- Notes -- Notes to chapter 1 -- Notes to chapter 2 -- Notes to chapter 3 -- Notes to chapter 4 -- Notes to chapter 5 -- Notes to chapter 6 -- Bibliography -- Index.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 Resource Centre. All rights reserved.