Rethinking Expropriation Law II : Context, Criteria, and Consequences of Expropriation.
- 1st ed.
- 1 online resource (399 pages)
Cover -- PREFACE -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Chapter 1 Introduction: Context, Criteria, and Consequences of Expropriation -- 1.2 The Historical Context of Expropriation -- 1.3 Criteria of Expropriation within Their Legal Context: Common Law vs. Continental Law -- 1.4 Criteria: Expropriation of What and by Whom? -- 1.5 Criteria of Expropriation: Beyond the Public Purpose Requirement -- 1.6 Consequences of Expropriation -- 1.7 Conclusion -- Chapter 2 Confiscation and Expropriation: The Legal Consequences of Roman Imperialism -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Expropriation in the Modern World -- 2.3 Confiscation or Expropriation in the Roman RepublicSee in more detail S.T. Roselaar, Public land in the Roman Republic: a ... -- 2.4 Confiscation and Expropriation from Private Landowners in Times of War -- 2.5 Confiscation of Land in the Imperial Period -- 2.6 The Concept of Expropriation in the Roman World -- Bibliography -- Chapter 3 The History of Hungarian Expropriation Law -- 3.2 Early Stages of the Expropriation Law - Expropriation before the Reform Era -- 3.3 Expropriation Law from the Reform Era to 1948 -- 3.4.1 The Characteristics of the 1955 Code -- 3.4.2 The Characteristics of the 1965 Code -- 3.5 Expropriation Law after the Regime Change of 1989/1990 -- 3.6.1 The Expropriation Procedure -- 3.6.2 The Fulfillment of Requirement 'in Public Interest' -- 3.6.3 The Fulfillment of the Requirement for 'Full, Unconditional, and Immediate Compensation' -- General Principles of Compensation and Methods of Appraisement -- Factors Disregarded in the Expropriation Process -- Compensating the Loss of Value through the Expropriation -- Compensation for Eliminated Rights of Third Parties -- Compensation for the right of the use of land -- Compensation for the rights of the beneficiary -- Compensation by Means of a Substitute Estate -- The Immediacy of Compensation. 3.7 The New Tendencies in the Legislation -- Outline placeholder -- The Exclusion of Review -- Issues Concerning the Purposes of Expropriation -- Limitations on the Dispositional Authority of the Expropriated Owner -- The 2012 Amendment of Act XCIII of 1995 -- 3.8 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Chapter 4 Towards a Paradigm Shift in the Application of Expropriation Law in Flanders -- 4.1 Introduction: Problematic Legislative Context -- 4.2 Hopeful Trend -- 4.4.1 First Indication: Full Separation of Powers in Expropriation Practice -- 4.4.2 Second Indication: Exceptional Legislation Has Again Become the Exception -- 4.4.3 Third Indication: the Plea of Self-Realization Is Accepted -- 4.4.4 Fourth Indication: Expropriation as a Risk -- 4.5 An Important Counter-Indication -- Bibliography -- Chapter 5 Hidden Expropriation in Globalization and Soft Law Protection of Communal Property Rights -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Hidden Expropriation in Globalization -- 5.3 The Evolution of Peoples' Rights -- 5.4 The Current Soft Law Protection of Communal Property Rights -- 5.5 'Softness' in the Global Normative System -- 5.6 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Chapter 6 The Public Use Requirement and the Character of Consequentialist Reasoning -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Human Flourishing and Necessary Capabilities -- 6.3 The Public Use Requirement, the Social Obligation Norm, and Expropriation -- 6.4.1 Forms of Consequentialism -- 6.4.2 Purposive Analysis -- 6.4.3 Property's Values -- 6.4.3.1 Linking Property's Values with Property's Types -- 6.4.3.2 Purposive Analysis Is Dynamic -- 6.4.4 Capabilities, Values, and Resources -- 6.5 Kelo Revisited -- 6.6 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Chapter 7 More Safeguards instead of a Ban of Economic Development Takings -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2.1 The Dogmatic Structure of 'Public Use' under the Fifth Amendment. 7.2.2 The Dogmatic Structure of 'Public Good' under the German Basic Law -- 7.2.3 'Public Good' as a Comparative Term -- 7.2.3.1 The Definition of 'Public Good' -- 7.3 Is Economic Development a Legitimate Purpose in Expropriation Law? -- 7.4.1 The Specificity of the Project's Purpose in the Expropriation Statute -- 7.4.1.1 Expropriation Statutes under the Fifth Amendment and the Connecticut State Constitution -- 7.4.1.2 Expropriation Statutes under the German Basic Law -- 7.4.1.3 A Trend towards Project-Specific Statutes in German Law -- 7.4.2 Protection of Home Owners and the Disadvantaged -- 7.4.3 Inspiration from Other US States -- 7.5 The Economic, Environmental, and Social Context of the Project, Its Purpose, and the Expropriation -- 7.5.1 Kelo: Legitimate Purpose-Centered Approach -- 7.5.2 German Law: Proportionality Tests -- 7.5.3 Protection of Home Owners and the Disadvantaged -- 7.5.4 Inspiration from Other US States -- 7.6 Additional Protection of the Home -- 7.7.1 Deference versus Control -- 7.7.2 Protection of Home Owners and the Disadvantaged -- 7.8 Securing Measures -- 7.8.1 US Supreme Court: Motive-Oriented Approach -- 7.8.2 Connecticut: Some Preventive Elements -- 7.8.3.1 Preventive Measures -- 7.8.3.2 Corrective Measures -- 7.8.4 Protection of Home Owners and the Disadvantaged -- 7.8.5 Inspiration from Other US States -- 7.9 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Chapter 8 'Regulatory Expropriation' under German Constitutional Law and in International Investment Law - The Case of Vattenf... -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Vattenfall and the German Nuclear Phase-Out -- 8.3.1 Protection of Property and Protection of Legitimate Expectations -- 8.3.1.1 Expropriation or Determination of the Content and the Limits of Private Property -- 8.3.1.2 The Proportionality Test -- 8.3.2 Application to Vattenfall. 8.3.2.1 Expropriation or Determination of the Content and the Limits of Private Property -- 8.3.2.2 The Proportionality Test -- 8.4 International Investment Law -- Outline placeholder -- 8.4.1.1 Introduction -- a Metalclad Corporation v. The United States of Mexico -- b Tecnicas Medioambientales Tecmed S.A. v. United Mexican States -- c Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic -- e Vattenfall v. Federal Republic of Germany -- 8.4.1.3 Property Protection Unbound? -- 8.4.2.1 Introduction -- 8.4.2.2 Relevant Case Law -- 8.4.2.3 Fair and Equitable Treatment Unbound? -- 8.4.3 Application of Investment Protection Law to Vattenfall -- 8.4.4 Recent Developments in Investment Protection Law: Inclusion of a 'Right to Regulate' -- 8.4.5 Main Differences between the German Constitution and International Investment Law -- 8.4.6 Justification of Differences to National Protection Standards -- 8.5 Conclusion and Outlook: What Could This All Mean for Property Law? -- Bibliography -- Chapter 9 The Impairment of Subsurface Resource Rights by Government as a 'Taking' of Property: a Canadian Perspective -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2.1 Compensation Claims are Statutory -- 9.2.2 Expropriation and Constructive Taking -- 9.2.3 Implied Right to Compensation -- 9.2.4 Constructive Takings in Canadian law -- 9.3 Conservation and Resource Rights -- 9.3.1 Gas Cap Preservation -- 9.3.2 The Gas Over Bitumen Dispute -- 9.4 Mineral Title Clarification -- 9.4.1 Competing Private Claims: Coalbed Methane (CBM) -- 9.4.2 Competing Private Claims: Gas Storage -- 9.4.3 Competing Claims between Government and Private Interests -- 9.5 Planning Legislation -- 9.5.1 Impairment of Property Rights under ALSA -- 9.5.2 Statutory Compensation and Other Rights under ALSA -- 9.5.2.1 Statutory Consents -- 9.5.2.2 'Compensable Takings' -- 9.6 Conclusion -- Bibliography. Chapter 10 'Dissolving Condominium, Private Takings, and the Nature of Property' -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Non-Consensual Dissolution of Condominium in Statutes and the Courts -- 10.3 Non-Consensual Dissolution of Condominium as Private-to-Private Takings -- 10.4 Dissolving Condominium, Takings, and Conceptions of Property -- 10.5 Condominium, Dissolution, and the Nature of Property -- Bibliography -- Chapter 11 The Principle of Good Governance in Expropriation Law -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2.1 The Concept of Good Governance -- 11.2.2 Good Governance in the European Union -- 11.2.3 Good Governance in the Council of Europe -- 11.3 Good Governance and the Right to Property (Article 1 FP) -- 11.3.1 Case Law Explicitly Referring to 'the Principle of Good Governance' -- 11.3.1.1 The Obligation to Act in Good Time -- 11.3.1.2 The Obligation to Act in an Appropriate Manner -- 11.3.1.3 The Obligation to Act with the utmost Consistency -- 11.3.2 Case Law Applying But Not Mentioning 'the Principle of Good Governance' -- 11.3.3 Meaning of Good Governance in the Context of Article 1 FP -- 11.4 Conclusions on the Principle of Good Governance in Expropriation Law -- Bibliography -- Chapter 12 On Benefit Sharing and the Compensatory Approach to Economic Development Takings -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2 The Compensatory Approach to Economic Development Takings -- 12.3 The No-Scheme Principle -- 12.4 Norwegian Compensation Law -- 12.4.1 Appraisal Courts and 'Full Compensation' -- 12.4.2 The Current Use Rule and the Foreseeability Test -- 12.5 Compensation for Waterfalls -- 12.5.1 A Case Study of Compensatory Benefit Sharing: The Natural Horsepower Method -- 12.5.2 New Methods for Compensating Waterfalls -- 12.6 Final Remarks and Future Work -- Bibliography -- Chapter 13 Expropriation Effects on Residential Communities -- 13.1 Introduction. 13.2 One Size Does Not Fit All: The State's Pluralistic Obligation to Distinguish among Residential Communities.