TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bayer,Josef
AU  - Hinterhölzl,Roland
AU  - Trotzke,Andreas
TI  - Discourse-oriented Syntax
T2  - Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today
SN  - 9789027267726
AV  - P291.D567 2015 
U1  - 415 
PY  - 2015///
CY  - Philadelphia
PB  - John Benjamins Publishing Company
KW  - Grammar, Comparative and general--Syntax
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Discourse-oriented Syntax -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Issues in discourse-oriented syntax -- 1. Issues at the syntax-discourse interface -- 2. The contributions -- References -- The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The derivation of left peripheral particles -- 2.1 Left peripheral particles and syntactic constituency -- 2.2 Left peripheral particles and generalized transformations -- 2.3 Stacked left peripheral particles -- 3. Left peripheral particles and emphasis -- 3.1 The notion of emphasis for intensity -- 3.2 Emphasis for intensity in the left periphery -- 3.3 Emphasis for intensity and left peripheral particles -- 4. Conclusion and outlook -- References -- On the interpretation of modal particles in non-assertive speech acts in German and Bellunese -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Bellunese particles and their German correspondents -- 2.1 Particles deriving from pronouns -- 2.1.1 Lu -- 2.1.2 Ti -- 2.2 Particles deriving from adverbs -- 2.2.1 Mo -- 2.2.2 Po -- 2.3 On the interaction between particles and wh-movement -- 2.4 Interim summary -- 3. Interpretation of the basic facts -- 3.1 Deriving the expressive meanings as secondary illocutionary effects -- 3.1.1 doch -- 3.1.2 denn -- 3.1.3 nun -- 3.1.4 ja -- 3.1.5 The impact of intonation -- 3.2 Some consequences and implications of the modular approach -- 4. Towards a syntactic analysis of modal particles in standard and special questions -- 4.1 On the distinction between information questions and special questions -- 4.2 The analysis of standard and special questions in Bellunese -- 4.3 The analysis of standard and special questions in German. -- 5. Conclusions -- References -- Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective -- 1. Introduction -- 2. On verb-based particles; 3. Italian sentence-final particles occur in the IP layer -- 3.1 Adverb-based particles -- 3.2 Verb-based particles -- 4. Sentence-initial particles -- 4.1 Semantic contribution -- 4.2 Clause types -- 4.3 Agreement patterns. -- 4.4 Ordering restrictions -- 4.5 The discourse particle dai -- 4.6 Interim conclusions -- 5. Cross-linguistic evidence -- 5.1 The distribution -- 5.2 The analysis -- 5.3 Particles and vocatives -- 5.4 The refinement of the analysis -- 6. Back to Italian: The interaction of discourse particles and vocatives -- 7. Conclusions -- References -- Italian adverbs and discourse particles -- 1. Discourse particles as functional heads -- 1.1 Complementizers and wh-pronouns -- 1.2 The pa/po particle in varieties of the Trentino - Alto Adige -- 2. Discourse particles as weak adverbs -- 2.1 The strong-weak pronoun opposition -- 2.2 Italian poi 'then' -- 3. The (scopal) ambiguity of adverbs and particles. -- 3.1 Three short case studies -- 3.2 Conclusions -- References -- Is particle a (unified) category? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The modal particles: Core properties -- 3. Particles as grammatical markers in the left periphery -- 4. Particles as verbal bases: Tha and as -- 4.1 Verbal bases and modality -- 4.2 Their position in the left periphery -- 5. Particles as nominals: Na and mi -- 5.1 An overview and an analysis of na -- 5.2 The curious status of mi -- 5.3 The unification of mi -- 6. Conclusions -- References -- The particle how -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Complementizer how -- 3. Interrogative how -- 4. How as part of an Adjective Phrase -- 5. Minimalism and features -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- The cartography of yes and no in West Flemish -- 1. Introduction: Aim and scope of the paper -- 1.1 A typology of West Flemish response particles -- 1.1.1 Agreeing particles -- 1.1.2 Bare particles -- 1.2 Focus of the paper; 1.3 Outline of the paper -- 2. The data -- 2.1 The basic patterns in Lapscheure West Flemish -- 2.1.1 Agreement marking -- 2.1.2 Reversal particles -- 2.2 The shape of the agreement: Cross-dialectal microvariation -- 2.3 The shape of the agreement marking -- 3. Arguments against a PF-deletion analysis -- 3.1 Non-optionality of 'clausal silence' -- 3.2 Absence of agreement marking in clearer cases of PF-deletion -- 3.3 Lack of extraction -- 4. Van Craenenbroeck (2010): A TP pro-form -- 4.1 Summary -- 4.2 Some problems for the analysis -- 5. Our analysis -- 5.1 Explaining 'clausal silence': Ja/nee as TP proforms -- 5.2 A sui generis agreement marking -- 5.3 Agreeing yes/no and V2 -- 5.3.1 Background assumptions: Cartography and SubjP -- 5.3.2 The syntax of ja/nee replies -- 5.3.3 The syntax of reversal ja/nee responses -- 5.3.4 The syntax of 'reversal doet' -- 5.3.4.1 The empirical data. We have said that conjugated ja/nee move as heads through Fin+Phi to satisfy V2. But the 'emphatic'/reversal forms with the reversal schwa can also co-occur with the verb doen ('do'). We summarize the core empirical data first. -- 5.3.4.2 The syntax of reversal responses. We first consider the derivation of (53b) in which reversal ja-j-e/nee-j-e combine with reversal doet. -- 6. Summary and questions for future research -- References -- On polarity particles in Italian varieties -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The syntax of emphasis: A summary of Poletto &amp -- Zanuttini (2013) -- 3. Emphatic structures with a final polarity particle -- 4. The syntax of reinforced particles in Southern Italian dialects -- 5. An overview on emphasis as repetition -- 6. Conclusion -- References -- Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery -- 1. Introduction -- 2. A brief characterization of Clitic Left Dislocation and Hanging Topic -- 3. An alternative analysis; 3.1 A few words on parentheticals -- 4. Back to CLLD and HT -- 5. Concluding remarks -- References -- Index
UR  - https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4198271
ER  -