ORPP logo
Image from Google Jackets

Selected Developments Related to Takings Issues, 2001-2002.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Washington : Environmental Law Institute, 2001Copyright date: ©2003Description: 1 online resource (8 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Selected Developments Related to Takings Issues, 2001-2002LOC classification:
  • KF5624 -- .M45 2003eb
Online resources:
Contents:
A. The facts -- B. Procedural history -- C. U.S. Supreme Court decision -- A. The facts -- B. Procedural history -- C. U.S. Supreme Court decision -- A. Ripeness: Williamson County stays, but (says the Court) let's be clear about a few things ... -- B. Penn Central rules! -- C. Lucas cases: an endangered species? -- D. Physical and regulatory takings: never the twain shall meet -- E. The "parcel as a whole" rule: a concern of the Court, or not? -- F. The notice rule: not absolute, but absolutely still relevant -- G. Moratoria used as land-use planning tools are not per se takings, but ... -- A. Takings claims against the United States -- B. Takings claims against states/localities -- A. Takings claims against the United States -- B. Takings claims against states/localities.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

A. The facts -- B. Procedural history -- C. U.S. Supreme Court decision -- A. The facts -- B. Procedural history -- C. U.S. Supreme Court decision -- A. Ripeness: Williamson County stays, but (says the Court) let's be clear about a few things ... -- B. Penn Central rules! -- C. Lucas cases: an endangered species? -- D. Physical and regulatory takings: never the twain shall meet -- E. The "parcel as a whole" rule: a concern of the Court, or not? -- F. The notice rule: not absolute, but absolutely still relevant -- G. Moratoria used as land-use planning tools are not per se takings, but ... -- A. Takings claims against the United States -- B. Takings claims against states/localities -- A. Takings claims against the United States -- B. Takings claims against states/localities.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 Resource Centre. All rights reserved.