Metaphor and National Identity : Alternative Conceptualization of the Treaty of Trianon.

Intro -- Metaphor and National Identity -- Editorial page -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Dedication page -- Table of contents -- Acknowledgements -- 1. Introduction -- 1. The Peace Treaty of Trianon -- 2. The aim of the research -- 3. Scope of the research -- 4. Research questions -- 5. Hypotheses -- 6. Corpus -- 7. Outline -- 8. The theoretical background of the research -- 8.1 Language, culture, and cognition -- 8.2 Conceptual system -- 8.3 Mental space, frame, idealized cognitive model (ICM), cognitive model, cultural model, image schema -- 8.4 Conceptual category -- 8.5 Conceptual metonymy -- 8.6 Conceptual metaphor -- 8.6.1 The elements of conceptual metaphor -- 8.6.2 Discourse metaphors -- 8.6.3 The motivation of metaphor production -- 8.6.4 Metaphor evolution -- 8.7 Force dynamics -- 8.8 Construal operations -- 9. Methodology -- 9.1 Metaphor identification procedures -- 9.1.1 The method of traditional CMT -- 9.1.2 Metaphor identification procedure (MIP) -- 9.1.3 Metaphor identification procedure of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (MIP VU) -- 9.1.4 Discourse metaphor analysis -- 9.1.5 The discourse dynamic approach of metaphors and the metaphor-centered discourse analysis -- 9.1.6 Cognitive discourse analysis -- 9.2 Mixed method: A two-level metaphor analysis -- 10. Notes -- 2. The agreement frame -- 1. The nation, country, and the state frames -- 2. The Peace Treaty of Trianon as an event and as a status -- 3. The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a non-prototypical agreement and as a dictate -- 4. The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a complex event -- 4.1 The sequential scanning of the Peace Treaty of Trianon -- 4.2 The summary scanning of the Trianon peace treaty -- 4.3 The Trianon peace treaty as a sub-event of a sequence of causes and effects -- 5. Conceptual metonymies of the concepts of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon.

5.1 The decision made in Trianon as a source concept -- 5.1.1 A sub-event of agreement for agreement → a sub-event of the complex event for the complex event → part for whole metonymy -- 5.2 The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a source concept -- 5.2.1 Agreement making for the dominant party of the agreement → the event for one of the participants of the event → whole for part metonymy -- 5.2.2 The document ratifying the agreement for the agreement → a physical object for an event → part for whole metonymy -- 5.3 Trianon as a source concept -- 5.3.1 The place where the peace treaty was ratified for the time of ratification→ the place of the salient event of the complex event for the time of the complex event → part for part metonymy -- 5.3.2 The place where the agreement was ratified for the agreement making→ the place of the complex event's salient event for the complex event → part for whole metonymy -- 5.3.3 The place where the agreement was ratified for the dominant party of agreement making→ the place of the complex event's salient event for the dominant party of the complex event → part for part metonymy -- 5.3.4 The place where the agreement was ratified for the knowledge about the agreement→ the place of the complex event's salient event for knowledge about the complex event → part for whole metonymy -- 5.4 The scope of the source concepts of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon -- 5.5 The relation of the terms of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon -- 5.5.1 Adjective phrases -- 5.5.2 Possessive noun phrase -- 5.5.3 Compounds -- 6. Conceptual metaphors of the Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon -- 6.1 Trianon as a value of a category role -- 6.2 Trianon as an input space -- 6.3 Trianon and the peace treaty as agents -- 6.3.1 Trianon and the peace treaty as persons who cause harm.

6.3.2 Trianon and the peace treaty are means of disintegrating an object -- 6.4 Trianon as a substance -- 6.4.1 Trianon is a substance in the mind -- 6.4.2 Trianon is substance in the soul -- 6.5 Trianon is mental and emotional illness -- 7. Metaphors and metonymies of Trianon -- 8. Summary -- 3. The conceptualization of the consequences of the Peace Treaty of Trianon -- 1. The conceptualization of the direct and indirect consequences of the Peace Treaty of Trianon -- 2. Conceptualization of the territorial changes -- 2.1 Change of the status of the possessed object (country, territory) -- 2.1.1 Reducing a (country's) territory is disintegrating an object/body -- reducing a (country's) territory is detaching an object -- The size of the object (the country's territory) reduces because an agent detaches parts of the integral object. One more step can be added to this process: the external force can attach the detached part/piece to another object. The metaphorical entailme -- reducing a (country's) territory is cutting an object/material up -- In this metaphor, the integrity of a homogeneous object is dissolved with a sharp tool by the external force. The metaphor consists (1) an agent who cuts the object up, (2) a patient, who is cut up and (3) a sharp tool with which the agent cuts up the obj -- reducing a (country's) territory is tailoring a (possessed) material -- reducing a (country's) territory is chopping up an (/a possessed) object/material/body -- If the means of cutting is conceptualized as a blade, then the source domain activates the piece of knowledge based on our everyday experience that with a bard meat or some material (e.g., wood) is usually chopped. Chopping is an intense version of cuttin -- reducing a (country's) territory is truncating an (/a possessed) object/material/body.

The territory of Hungary is not only conceptualized as a possessed object, but also as a human body, which is the property of Hungary. Although the body is made up of parts, it is conceptualized as an integral unit, as the parts (body parts) support the w -- reducing a (country's) territory is tearing a material apart -- In this metaphor, the integrity of the material (territory) is dissolved as it is torn apart. Due to the external force's interference, the unity of the material ceases to exist and more parts evolve from it. Similar to the cutting ICM, the tearing ICM al -- 2.1.2 Reducing a (country's) territory is reducing the size of an object -- 2.1.3 Reducing a (country's) territory is changing an object's spatial position -- 2.1.4 Profiling the agent -- 2.1.5 Backgrounding and foregrounding the degree of the change experienced by the patient -- 2.2 The change that affects the possessor's (Hungary, nation, Hungarian Kingdom) status -- 2.2.1 Reducing a (country's) territory is acquiring (part of) an object -- 2.2.2 Foregrounding and backgrounding the agent -- 3. The conceptualization of the population changes -- 3.1 The change affects the original owner (Hungary) -- 3.1.1 Reducing a country's population is acquiring part of a possessed object -- 3.2 The change affects the possessed object (nation) -- 3.2.1 Reducing the country's population is disintegrating an object -- 3.2.2 Reducing a country's population is moving an object from one container to another -- 3.2.3 Foregrounding and backgrounding the one who causes change -- 3.3 The dual event structure model -- 4. The conceptualization of the changes affecting the material and cultural resources -- 4.1 The change affects the possessed object (material and cultural resources) -- 4.1.1 Reducing the country's material and cultural resources is disintegrating an object.

4.1.2 Reducing the country's material and cultural resources is ­moving an object from a container to another -- 4.2 The change affects the owner (Hungary, nation, Hungarian Kingdom) -- 4.2.1 Reducing the country's material and cultural resources is acquiring an object -- 5. The conceptualization of the change of the Hungarian nation and Hungarian state categories -- 5.1 The pre-1920 Hungarian nation and the post-1920 Hungarian nation categories -- 5.2 The category of Hungarians living in the successor states -- 5.3 The conceptualization of the relationship of the central and peripheral members of the pre-1920 Hungarian nation category -- 5.4 The conceptualization of the relationship of the post-1920 Hungarian nation category and the nations of the beneficiary states categories -- 5.5 The conceptualization of the relationship of the central and peripheral members of the nations of the beneficiary states category -- 5.6 The conceptualization of the relationship of the central and peripheral members of the post-1920 Hungarian nation category -- 5.6.1 The nation is substance in a container -- 5.6.2 The Hungarian nation is a whole/unity -- 5.6.3 the nation is a disintegrated object -- 5.6.4 The nation is a person. Life is a journey -- 5.6.5 The nation is a family. The relations of the members of the nation are family relations -- 5.6.6 Mixed metaphors -- 5.6.7 The main meaning foci of the conceptual metaphors of the relationship of the central and peripheral members of the post-1920 Hungarian nation category -- 5.7 The conceptualization of the relationship of the central members, of the peripheral members of the post-1920 Hungarian nation category and of the central members of the nations of the beneficiary states category -- 5.7.1 The agent who causes harm -- 5.7.2 The nurturant mother -- 5.7.3 The child who needs to be looked after -- 5.7.4 The victim.

causing harm is physical impact.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.