Prototypical Argumentative Patterns : Exploring the Relationship Between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context.

Intro -- Prototypical Argumentative Patterns -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgment -- chapter 1. Introduction -- chapter 2. Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective: Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The pragma-dialectical standard theory -- 2.3 The extended pragma-dialectical theory -- 2.4 Taking the institutional context of argumentative discourse into account -- 2.5 Prototypical argumentative patterns -- 2.6 Argumentative patterns with pragmatic argumentation as main argument -- References -- chapter 3. The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament: The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 The structure of legislative debate in the European Parliament -- 3.3 Problem-solving argumentation -- 3.4 Argumentation used to defend problem-solving argumentation -- 3.5 Argumentation to attack problem-solving argumentation -- 3.6 Prototypical argumentative patterns -- 3.7 Conclusion -- References -- chapter 4. The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The argumentation of the parliamentary committees of inquiry -- 4.3 Argumentative patterns making use of pragmatic argumentation -- 4.4 Defining appeals to the majority -- 4.5 Argumentative patterns at work -- 4.6 Results and challenges -- Acknowledgements -- References -- chapter 5. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisisons: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisisons -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Pragmatic argumentation in legal justification.

5.3 Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation referring to consequences in light of the purpose of the rule -- 5.4 Conclusion -- References -- chapter 6. The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements: The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 The use of pragmatic argumentation as an institutional requirement -- 6.3 Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements -- 6.4 The argumentative patterns resulting from strategic maneuvering within institutional constraints -- 6.5 Exemplary analysis of a prototypical pattern of an OTC-medicine advertisement -- 6.6 Conclusion -- References -- chapter 7. Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament: Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Prototypical argumentative patterns in the debates of the European Parliament -- 7.3 The argument by example -- 7.4 The use of the argument by example in debates of the European Parliament -- 7.5 Conclusion -- References -- chapter 8. Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions: Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Legal justification and the application of legal rules in clear cases and hard cases -- 8.3 Prototypical argumentative patterns in clear cases and hard cases -- 8.4 Prototypical argumentative patterns in hard cases about the meaning of a legal rule -- 8.5 Conclusion -- References.

chapter 9. Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements: Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Supporting 'safety' and 'there is no better alternative' claims -- 9.3 Types of symptomatic argumentation in OTC-medicine advertisements -- 9.4 Extensions of symptomatic argumentation in OTC-medicine advertisements -- 9.5 Manoeuvring strategically with symptomatic argumentation within the institutional constraints of OTC-medicine advertisements -- 9.6 Conclusion -- References -- chapter 10. The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context: The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context -- 10.1 Identifying prototypical argumentative patterns -- 10.2 Exploitation of the same argument scheme -- 10.3 Exploitation of different argument schemes -- 10.4 Institutional rationales of argumentative patterns -- 10.5 Conclusion -- References -- Index.

By exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and the institutional context, Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Corina Andone, Eveline Feteris and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans have provided a new and illuminating perspective on the context-dependency of argumentative discourse.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.