ORPP logo
Image from Google Jackets

Rethinking Expropriation Law I : Public Interest in Expropriation.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: Utrecht : Eleven International Publishing, 2015Copyright date: ©2015Edition: 1st edDescription: 1 online resource (411 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789462744448
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Rethinking Expropriation Law IDDC classification:
  • 343.0252
LOC classification:
  • K3511 -- .R48 2015eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Cover -- Chapter 1 Rethinking Public Interest in Expropriation Law: Introductory Observations -- 1.1 The Law, Good Governance, and Expropriation -- 1.2 The Basic Requirements and Interpretative Challenges -- 1.2.1 Questions of Scope -- 1.2.2 Questions of Context -- 1.3.1 Terminology and Interpretation -- 1.3.2 Public Purpose in the Context of Good Governance -- 1.3.3 Public Purpose and the Determination of Fair Compensation -- 1.4 Urgent Need to Reconceptualize Expropriation -- 1.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 2 Public Interest in Takings Cases in Italy and France: The Constitutional and Human Rights Dimension -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Right of Property at the Interface between National Legal Traditions and the ECHR -- 2.3 Putting the Public Interest Requirement into Context: Scope and Meaning of the Protection of Property Rights -- 2.4 Looking for the Meaning of Public Interest through the Lens of Courts -- 2.5 Questioning the Public Interest of Takings: Which Standard of Judicial Review? -- 2.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 3 The Poverty of Precedent on Public Purpose/Interest -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2.1 Anomalous Relationship between Statute and Constitution -- 3.2.2 Origins of the Binary Formulation -- 3.2.3 Deliberate Vagueness of the Definition -- 3.3 Public Purpose/Public Interest in South African Expropriation Law -- Outline placeholder -- 3.3.1.1 Public Purposes: Different Applications -- 3.3.1.2 Apartheid as a Public Purpose -- 3.3.1.3 The Poverty of Pre-Constitutional Precedent -- 3.3.2 Precedent from the Constitutional Era -- 3.3.2.1 Public Purposes/Public Interest in the Expropriation Context Since 1996 -- a Calculation of Just Compensation -- b Restitution through the Land Claims Court's Orders -- c Eviction Proceedings -- 3.3.2.3 The Poverty of Post-Apartheid Precedent -- 3.4 Conclusion: Rethinking Public Interest.
Chapter 4 "Somewhat at Sea" -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Why State Law Matters -- 4.3.1 Thomas M. Cooley and the Origins of Michigan's Constitutional Limitations on Public Use -- 4.3.2 Poletown: General Motors and Justice James L. Ryan -- 4.3.3 Hathcock: Resurrecting Cooley and Ryan -- 4.3.4 Distinguishing Hathcock and Constitutional Codification -- 4.4.1 The Post-Kelo Constitutional Amendments -- 4.4.2 Failed Test Case and Constitutional Revision -- 4.4.3 Evading Third-Party Transfer Limits - Feudal Tenures to the Rescue -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 5 Reviewing Expropriations -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The Preference for Means-Ends Scrutiny in Expropriation Law -- 5.3.1 Constitutional Background -- 5.3.2 Urban Renewal -- 5.4 Property Values beyond Articles 40.3.2° and 43 -- 5.4.1 The Lack of 'Internal' Guidance -- 5.4.2 The Directive Principles of Social Policy -- 5.4.3 Inviolability of the Dwelling -- 5.5 Conclusions -- Chapter 6 In the Shadow of Zimbabwe -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 A History of Land and Agrarian Reform -- 6.3 The Role of Law -- 6.4 Land, Law, and Poverty Reduction -- 6.5 Claiming Land and Protecting Property -- 6.6 Expropriation and the Issue of 'Willing-Buyer, Willing-Seller' -- 6.6.1 A Southern African Context -- 6.6.2 Protection of Property and the Law of Expropriation in Post-Apartheid SA -- 6.7 Conclusion: The Expropriation Bills of 2008, 2013, and 2015 -- Chapter 7 Reclaiming Property -- Outline placeholder -- 7.2.1 General Overview -- 7.2.2 Criteria -- 7.2.4 Who Has a Right to Restitution/Compensation? -- 7.2.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.3.2 Criteria -- 7.3.3 Prescription -- 7.3.6 Conclusion -- 7.4.1 General Overview -- 7.4.2 Criteria -- 7.4.3 Prescription -- 7.4.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.5.1 General Overview -- 7.5.2 Criteria -- 7.5.4 Who Has a Right to Restitution/Compensation? -- 7.6.1 General Overview -- 7.6.2 Criteria.
7.6.3 Prescription -- 7.6.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.6.6 Conclusion -- 7.7 South Africa -- 7.8 European Court of Human Rights -- 7.9 Conclusions -- Chapter 8 Exactions and the Rule of Law -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Takings, Due Process, and Exactions -- 8.2.1 Takings and Due Process -- 8.2.2 Enter Exactions -- 8.2.3 The Scope of Scrutiny -- 8.2.4 The Koontz Decision -- 8.3 Normative Foundations for Exactions Law -- 8.3.1 Exactions as Unconstitutional Conditions in Land Use -- 8.3.2 Rule of Law -- 8.4 Searching for Limits within Koontz -- 8.5 A Way Forward? -- 8.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 9 The Public Purpose for the Expropriation of Land -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Three Reasons to Examine the Democratic Legitimacy of the Public Purpose -- 9.3.1 Legitimacy -- 9.3.2 Democracy -- 9.3.3 Democratic Legitimacy -- 9.4 The Dogmatic Structure of the Public Purpose Requirement -- 9.5 The Basis for Expropriation: An Act of Parliament -- 9.5.1 Democratic Legitimacy and the Act of Parliament -- 9.5.2.1 German Law -- 9.5.2.2 South African Law -- 9.5.2.3 English Law -- 9.6.1 Democratic Legitimacy and the Expropriation Authority -- 9.6.2 German Law -- 9.6.3 South African Law -- 9.6.4 English Law -- 9.7 Democratic Legitimacy and Participation in the Expropriation Procedure -- Outline placeholder -- 9.7.1.1 German Law -- 9.7.1.2 South African Law -- 9.7.1.3 English Law -- 9.7.2 Access to the Expropriation Procedure -- 9.7.2.2 South African Law -- 9.7.3 Form of Participation -- 9.7.3.1 Participation Mechanisms -- 9.7.3.2 German Law -- 9.7.3.3 South African Law -- 9.7.3.4 English Law -- 9.8 Democratic Legitimacy and the German Binding Land-Use Plan -- 9.9 Conclusion -- Chapter 10 The 'Land Assembly Districts' Solution to Third-Party Transfers -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2.1 The Defects of Private Land Assembly -- 10.2.2.1 Under-Compensation -- 10.2.2.2 Unfairness.
10.2.3.1 Payments above FMV -- 10.2.3.2 Judicial Review -- 10.3 An Outline of LADs -- Outline placeholder -- 10.3.1.2 Who Oversees LAD Formation? -- 10.3.2 Jurisdictional Rules -- 10.3.2.2 Auctioning Off the Neighborhood -- 10.4 How LADs Protect Property and Democracy Values -- 10.4.2 Voting Rules -- 10.5 Land Adjustment and LADs -- 10.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 11 Fundamental Premises of Land Expropriation in Poland -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2.1 Historical Overview -- 11.2.2 Expropriation in the Current Polish Constitution -- 11.2.2.1 The Object of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.2 The Scope of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.3 The Form of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.4 The Object of the Expropriated Right -- 11.3 The Public Purpose Requirement -- 11.4.1 The Constitutional Notion of Just Compensation -- 11.4.2 Just Compensation in the MRE -- 11.5 Conclusions -- Chapter 12 Less Invasive Means -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2.1 Introduction -- 12.2.2 Bartsch Consult v. Mayoral Committee of the Maluti-A-Phofung Municipality -- 12.2.3 Erf 16 Bryntirion (Pty) Ltd. v. Minister of Public Works -- 12.3 The Relationship between Sections 25 and 36 of the 1996 Constitution -- 12.3.1 Introduction -- 12.3.2 Applying the FNB Methodology to All Constitutional Property Disputes -- 12.3.3 The Courts' Evasion of the FNB Methodology in Formal Expropriation Cases -- 12.3.4 Applying the Two-Stage Approach to Bill of Rights Litigation to Section 25(2) Disputes -- 12.3.5 Evaluation -- 12.4 Conclusion -- Chapter 13 Expropriatory Compensation, Distributive Justice, and the Rule of Law -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 Criticizing Prevailing Rationales for Partial Compensation -- 13.3 The Problems with Full Compensation -- 13.4 Partial Compensation and Property Values -- 13.5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 14 The Public Purpose Requirement in the Calculation of Just and Equitable Compensation.
14.1 Introduction -- 14.2 Negotiating a Property Clause -- 14.3 The Land Reform Programs -- 14.3.1 The Requirements for a Valid Expropriation in a Reform Context -- 14.3.2 South African Case Law on Section 25(3)(e) -- 14.4 An Alternative Interpretation of Section 25(3)(e) -- 14.4.1 Considering the Individual in a Societal Context: The German Approach -- 14.4.2 The Influence of the Changing Social and Moral Fiber of Society on the Compensation Amount: The Indian Example -- 14.4.3 Economic Reform and Measures to Achieve Greater Social Justice: European Court of Human Rights -- 14.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 15 When Does State Action Amount to Expropriation? Recent Australian Developments -- 15.1 Introduction -- 15.2 The Complexity of Australian Expropriation Law -- 15.3 Federal Constitutional Property Law in Australia: Section 51(xxxi) of the Commonwealth Constitution -- 15.4 When Taking of Property Requires No Just Terms Compensation -- 15.4.1 Criterion 1 - Defining Property - 'Liberally', but Conventionally -- 15.4.2 Criterion 2 - Differentiating Takings, Deprivation, and Expropriation from 'Acquisition' -- 15.4.3 Criterion 3 - The Acquisition of the Property in Question Is Permitted under Another Head of Power -- 15.5 Conclusion.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Cover -- Chapter 1 Rethinking Public Interest in Expropriation Law: Introductory Observations -- 1.1 The Law, Good Governance, and Expropriation -- 1.2 The Basic Requirements and Interpretative Challenges -- 1.2.1 Questions of Scope -- 1.2.2 Questions of Context -- 1.3.1 Terminology and Interpretation -- 1.3.2 Public Purpose in the Context of Good Governance -- 1.3.3 Public Purpose and the Determination of Fair Compensation -- 1.4 Urgent Need to Reconceptualize Expropriation -- 1.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 2 Public Interest in Takings Cases in Italy and France: The Constitutional and Human Rights Dimension -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Right of Property at the Interface between National Legal Traditions and the ECHR -- 2.3 Putting the Public Interest Requirement into Context: Scope and Meaning of the Protection of Property Rights -- 2.4 Looking for the Meaning of Public Interest through the Lens of Courts -- 2.5 Questioning the Public Interest of Takings: Which Standard of Judicial Review? -- 2.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 3 The Poverty of Precedent on Public Purpose/Interest -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2.1 Anomalous Relationship between Statute and Constitution -- 3.2.2 Origins of the Binary Formulation -- 3.2.3 Deliberate Vagueness of the Definition -- 3.3 Public Purpose/Public Interest in South African Expropriation Law -- Outline placeholder -- 3.3.1.1 Public Purposes: Different Applications -- 3.3.1.2 Apartheid as a Public Purpose -- 3.3.1.3 The Poverty of Pre-Constitutional Precedent -- 3.3.2 Precedent from the Constitutional Era -- 3.3.2.1 Public Purposes/Public Interest in the Expropriation Context Since 1996 -- a Calculation of Just Compensation -- b Restitution through the Land Claims Court's Orders -- c Eviction Proceedings -- 3.3.2.3 The Poverty of Post-Apartheid Precedent -- 3.4 Conclusion: Rethinking Public Interest.

Chapter 4 "Somewhat at Sea" -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Why State Law Matters -- 4.3.1 Thomas M. Cooley and the Origins of Michigan's Constitutional Limitations on Public Use -- 4.3.2 Poletown: General Motors and Justice James L. Ryan -- 4.3.3 Hathcock: Resurrecting Cooley and Ryan -- 4.3.4 Distinguishing Hathcock and Constitutional Codification -- 4.4.1 The Post-Kelo Constitutional Amendments -- 4.4.2 Failed Test Case and Constitutional Revision -- 4.4.3 Evading Third-Party Transfer Limits - Feudal Tenures to the Rescue -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 5 Reviewing Expropriations -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 The Preference for Means-Ends Scrutiny in Expropriation Law -- 5.3.1 Constitutional Background -- 5.3.2 Urban Renewal -- 5.4 Property Values beyond Articles 40.3.2° and 43 -- 5.4.1 The Lack of 'Internal' Guidance -- 5.4.2 The Directive Principles of Social Policy -- 5.4.3 Inviolability of the Dwelling -- 5.5 Conclusions -- Chapter 6 In the Shadow of Zimbabwe -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 A History of Land and Agrarian Reform -- 6.3 The Role of Law -- 6.4 Land, Law, and Poverty Reduction -- 6.5 Claiming Land and Protecting Property -- 6.6 Expropriation and the Issue of 'Willing-Buyer, Willing-Seller' -- 6.6.1 A Southern African Context -- 6.6.2 Protection of Property and the Law of Expropriation in Post-Apartheid SA -- 6.7 Conclusion: The Expropriation Bills of 2008, 2013, and 2015 -- Chapter 7 Reclaiming Property -- Outline placeholder -- 7.2.1 General Overview -- 7.2.2 Criteria -- 7.2.4 Who Has a Right to Restitution/Compensation? -- 7.2.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.3.2 Criteria -- 7.3.3 Prescription -- 7.3.6 Conclusion -- 7.4.1 General Overview -- 7.4.2 Criteria -- 7.4.3 Prescription -- 7.4.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.5.1 General Overview -- 7.5.2 Criteria -- 7.5.4 Who Has a Right to Restitution/Compensation? -- 7.6.1 General Overview -- 7.6.2 Criteria.

7.6.3 Prescription -- 7.6.5 Compensation Issues -- 7.6.6 Conclusion -- 7.7 South Africa -- 7.8 European Court of Human Rights -- 7.9 Conclusions -- Chapter 8 Exactions and the Rule of Law -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Takings, Due Process, and Exactions -- 8.2.1 Takings and Due Process -- 8.2.2 Enter Exactions -- 8.2.3 The Scope of Scrutiny -- 8.2.4 The Koontz Decision -- 8.3 Normative Foundations for Exactions Law -- 8.3.1 Exactions as Unconstitutional Conditions in Land Use -- 8.3.2 Rule of Law -- 8.4 Searching for Limits within Koontz -- 8.5 A Way Forward? -- 8.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 9 The Public Purpose for the Expropriation of Land -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Three Reasons to Examine the Democratic Legitimacy of the Public Purpose -- 9.3.1 Legitimacy -- 9.3.2 Democracy -- 9.3.3 Democratic Legitimacy -- 9.4 The Dogmatic Structure of the Public Purpose Requirement -- 9.5 The Basis for Expropriation: An Act of Parliament -- 9.5.1 Democratic Legitimacy and the Act of Parliament -- 9.5.2.1 German Law -- 9.5.2.2 South African Law -- 9.5.2.3 English Law -- 9.6.1 Democratic Legitimacy and the Expropriation Authority -- 9.6.2 German Law -- 9.6.3 South African Law -- 9.6.4 English Law -- 9.7 Democratic Legitimacy and Participation in the Expropriation Procedure -- Outline placeholder -- 9.7.1.1 German Law -- 9.7.1.2 South African Law -- 9.7.1.3 English Law -- 9.7.2 Access to the Expropriation Procedure -- 9.7.2.2 South African Law -- 9.7.3 Form of Participation -- 9.7.3.1 Participation Mechanisms -- 9.7.3.2 German Law -- 9.7.3.3 South African Law -- 9.7.3.4 English Law -- 9.8 Democratic Legitimacy and the German Binding Land-Use Plan -- 9.9 Conclusion -- Chapter 10 The 'Land Assembly Districts' Solution to Third-Party Transfers -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2.1 The Defects of Private Land Assembly -- 10.2.2.1 Under-Compensation -- 10.2.2.2 Unfairness.

10.2.3.1 Payments above FMV -- 10.2.3.2 Judicial Review -- 10.3 An Outline of LADs -- Outline placeholder -- 10.3.1.2 Who Oversees LAD Formation? -- 10.3.2 Jurisdictional Rules -- 10.3.2.2 Auctioning Off the Neighborhood -- 10.4 How LADs Protect Property and Democracy Values -- 10.4.2 Voting Rules -- 10.5 Land Adjustment and LADs -- 10.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 11 Fundamental Premises of Land Expropriation in Poland -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2.1 Historical Overview -- 11.2.2 Expropriation in the Current Polish Constitution -- 11.2.2.1 The Object of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.2 The Scope of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.3 The Form of Expropriation -- 11.2.2.4 The Object of the Expropriated Right -- 11.3 The Public Purpose Requirement -- 11.4.1 The Constitutional Notion of Just Compensation -- 11.4.2 Just Compensation in the MRE -- 11.5 Conclusions -- Chapter 12 Less Invasive Means -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2.1 Introduction -- 12.2.2 Bartsch Consult v. Mayoral Committee of the Maluti-A-Phofung Municipality -- 12.2.3 Erf 16 Bryntirion (Pty) Ltd. v. Minister of Public Works -- 12.3 The Relationship between Sections 25 and 36 of the 1996 Constitution -- 12.3.1 Introduction -- 12.3.2 Applying the FNB Methodology to All Constitutional Property Disputes -- 12.3.3 The Courts' Evasion of the FNB Methodology in Formal Expropriation Cases -- 12.3.4 Applying the Two-Stage Approach to Bill of Rights Litigation to Section 25(2) Disputes -- 12.3.5 Evaluation -- 12.4 Conclusion -- Chapter 13 Expropriatory Compensation, Distributive Justice, and the Rule of Law -- 13.1 Introduction -- 13.2 Criticizing Prevailing Rationales for Partial Compensation -- 13.3 The Problems with Full Compensation -- 13.4 Partial Compensation and Property Values -- 13.5 Concluding Remarks -- Chapter 14 The Public Purpose Requirement in the Calculation of Just and Equitable Compensation.

14.1 Introduction -- 14.2 Negotiating a Property Clause -- 14.3 The Land Reform Programs -- 14.3.1 The Requirements for a Valid Expropriation in a Reform Context -- 14.3.2 South African Case Law on Section 25(3)(e) -- 14.4 An Alternative Interpretation of Section 25(3)(e) -- 14.4.1 Considering the Individual in a Societal Context: The German Approach -- 14.4.2 The Influence of the Changing Social and Moral Fiber of Society on the Compensation Amount: The Indian Example -- 14.4.3 Economic Reform and Measures to Achieve Greater Social Justice: European Court of Human Rights -- 14.5 Conclusion -- Chapter 15 When Does State Action Amount to Expropriation? Recent Australian Developments -- 15.1 Introduction -- 15.2 The Complexity of Australian Expropriation Law -- 15.3 Federal Constitutional Property Law in Australia: Section 51(xxxi) of the Commonwealth Constitution -- 15.4 When Taking of Property Requires No Just Terms Compensation -- 15.4.1 Criterion 1 - Defining Property - 'Liberally', but Conventionally -- 15.4.2 Criterion 2 - Differentiating Takings, Deprivation, and Expropriation from 'Acquisition' -- 15.4.3 Criterion 3 - The Acquisition of the Property in Question Is Permitted under Another Head of Power -- 15.5 Conclusion.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

© 2024 Resource Centre. All rights reserved.