The Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations Within International Criminal Proceedings. (Record no. 106114)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 11668nam a22005293i 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | EBC4397543 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | MiAaPQ |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20240729130301.0 |
006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS | |
fixed length control field | m o d | |
007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | cr cnu|||||||| |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 240724s2015 xx o ||||0 eng d |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
International Standard Book Number | 9789004231412 |
Qualifying information | (electronic bk.) |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
Canceled/invalid ISBN | 9789004231429 |
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
System control number | (MiAaPQ)EBC4397543 |
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
System control number | (Au-PeEL)EBL4397543 |
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
System control number | (CaPaEBR)ebr11161625 |
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
System control number | (CaONFJC)MIL879113 |
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
System control number | (OCoLC)932593795 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Original cataloging agency | MiAaPQ |
Language of cataloging | eng |
Description conventions | rda |
-- | pn |
Transcribing agency | MiAaPQ |
Modifying agency | MiAaPQ |
050 #4 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER | |
Classification number | KZ7000 .C76 2015 |
082 0# - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
Classification number | 341.48 |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. |
245 14 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | The Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations Within International Criminal Proceedings. |
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT | |
Edition statement | 1st ed. |
264 #1 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE | |
Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture | Boston : |
Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer | BRILL, |
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice | 2015. |
264 #4 - PRODUCTION, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE, AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE | |
Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice | ©2016. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | 1 online resource (435 pages) |
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE | |
Content type term | text |
Content type code | txt |
Source | rdacontent |
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE | |
Media type term | computer |
Media type code | c |
Source | rdamedia |
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE | |
Carrier type term | online resource |
Carrier type code | cr |
Source | rdacarrier |
505 0# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | Intro -- The Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations within International Criminal Proceedings -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- Table of cases and statutes -- Introduction: Purpose, Methodology and Scope of the Monograph -- 1 Purpose of the Monograph -- 2 Underlying Methodology -- 3 Scope of the Monograph -- 4 Outline of the Chapters -- I: Conceptual Tools for Assessing Limitations upon the Exercise of Human Rights -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Justifications of Interferences with Human Rights -- 2.1 Internal and External Theories of Rights -- 2.2 Internal and External Limits on Rights -- 2.3 Techniques for the Resolution of Conflicts of Values -- 2.3.1 Conflict between Rights and Public Interest Grounds -- 2.3.1.1 Theory of Rights as 'Trumps' -- 2.3.1.2 End-Test (Legitimate Objective) and Broad Proportionality Analysis (Suitability, Less Restrictive Means and Balancing Tests) -- 2.3.1.3 End-Test and Two-Prong Proportionality Model (Suitability and Less Restrictive Means Tests) -- 2.3.1.4 End-Test and One-Prong Proportionality Analysis (Balancing) -- 2.3.1.5 End-Test and Two-Prong Proportionality Model (Suitability and Balancing Tests) -- 2.3.1.6 End-Test and Two-Prong Proportionality Model (Less Restrictive Means and Balancing Tests) -- 2.3.1.7 'Priority to Rights' Principle and Defijinitional Balancing -- 2.3.2 Conflict of Rights -- 2.3.2.1 Terminology -- 2.3.2.2 Interpretative Model: Determination of the Scope of the Conflicting Human Rights -- 2.3.2.3 Transposition of the End-Test and the Broad Proportionality Analysis to Conflict of Rights Situations -- 2.3.2.4 Hierarchy of Human Rights Principle -- 2.3.2.5 Mechanism of 'Practical Concordance' -- 2.3.3 Neighbouring Concepts to Proportionality that are Relevant to Both Types of Conflicts of Values. |
505 8# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | 2.3.3.1 Role of the Legality Principle -- 2.3.3.2 The 'Essence' of Rights Doctrine -- 3 Conclusion -- II: Institutional and Regulatory Context Underpinning the International Criminal Courts' Human Rights Limitation Analyses -- 1 Legal Basis for Human Rights Enforcement -- 1.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 1.2 The ICC -- 2 Procedural Guarantees at the Investigation and Interrogation Stages -- 2.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 2.2 The ICC -- 3 The Rights of the Accused -- 3.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 3.2 The ICC -- 3.3 Common Considerations: Features of the Right to a Fair Trial -- 4 Victims' Participation Rights -- 5 Substantive Human Rights -- 5.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 5.2 The ICC -- 6 Absence of Derogation Clause and Presence of Limitation and Qualification Clauses within International Criminal Procedural Law -- 6.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 6.1.1 General Framework -- 6.1.2 Presence of a Statutory Limitation Clause -- 6.1.3 Presence of Various Qualifijication Clauses -- 6.2 The ICC -- 6.2.1 General Framework -- 6.2.2 Presence of a Statutory Limitation Clause -- 6.2.3 Presence of Various Qualifijication Clauses -- 6.3 Commonalities -- 7 Role of the Legality Principle under International Criminal Procedural Law and International Criminal Law -- 8 Structural Difficulties in Drawing on a Hierarchy of Human Rights Model for Resolving Conflicts of Rights -- 9 Methods of Interpretation under International Criminal Procedural Law and International Criminal Law -- 10 Conclusion -- III: Formation of a Generic Justificatory Framework for Assessing External Limits upon any Fundamental Right or Defence Right -- 1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 2 The ICC -- 3 Conclusion -- IV: Implied External Limits on the Right to Self-Representation through the Assignment of Defence Counsel and of Standby Counsel -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Conceptions of the Right to Self-Representation. |
505 8# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | 3 Qualification Clauses Affecting the Exercise of the Right to Self-Representation -- 3.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 3.2 The ICC -- 4 Emergence of a Justificatory Framework for Reviewing Interferences with the Right to Self-Representation -- 4.1 Ad Hoc Tribunals' Case-Law Prior to the Milošević Appeals Representation Decision -- 4.1.1 The ICTR's Reliance on the Concepts of 'Inherent Powers' and 'Waiver of Rights' as Legal Bases and on 'The Interests of Justice' as an End-Test -- 4.1.2 The ICTY's Limitation Process Based on Various End-Tests -- 4.2 The Milošević Appeals Representation Decision and the Introduction of a Proportionality Analysis -- 4.3 ICTR's Case-Law Subsequent to the Milošević Appeals Representation Decision -- 4.4 ICTY's Case-Law Subsequent to the Milošević Appeals Representation Decision but Pre-dating the Insertion of r 45 ter Qualification Clause into the ICTY Rules -- 4.4.1 Overview of Judicial Trends -- 4.4.2 Status of the Right to Self-Representation as a 'Presumptive' and as a Qualified Defence Right -- 4.4.3 The Emphasis on a Particular Aspect of the 'Interests of Justice' as an End-Test, Namely the Need to End a Substantial and Persistent Obstructive Behavior -- 4.4.4 The Inspiration Drawn from ECHR Authorities Unrelated to the Right to Self-Representation and the Distanciation from the HRC's Case-Law -- 4.4.5 The Focus on the Less Restrictive Means Test in the Tribunal's Proportionality Analysis -- 4.4.6 Different Levels of Judicial Scrutiny in the Tribunal's Proportionality Analysis -- 4.4.7 'Proceduralisation' of the Justificatory Framework -- 4.4.8 Extension of the Scope of the Right to Self- Representation and of its Corresponding Justificatory Framework to Appeals Proceedings -- 4.4.9 Increasing Deference to the Accused's Preferences -- 4.4.10 Extension of the 'Interests of Justice' Criterion to Victim and Witness Protection. |
505 8# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | 4.4.11 Progressive Judicial Fatigue in the Tribunal's Review of International Human Rights Authorities -- 4.5 ICTY's Case-Law Subsequent to the Insertion of a Qualification Clause into the ICTY Rules -- 5 Elevation of the 'Interests of Justice' to an Overarching Legitimate Objective and the Presence of a Mixed Conflict of Values -- 5.1 Manifestation of the Underlying Conflict of Rights -- 5.2 Manifestation of the Underlying Conflict between a Right and a Public Interest Ground -- 6 Recognition of a Means-Test -- 6.1 Suitability Test -- 6.2 Less Restrictive Means Test -- 7 Mechanism of 'Practical Concordance' -- 8 Recognition of a Strict Proportionality Requirement -- 9 Failure of the Hierarchy of Rights Model to Capture the Judicial Rulings under Review from a Conflict of Rights Perspective -- 10 Adoption of a Teleological Method of Interpretation -- 11 Confrontation of Specific Justificatory Criteria with Generic Justificatory Criteria -- 12 Influence of International Human Rights Law -- 13 Conclusion -- V: Implied External Limits on the Right to Cross-Examination through Absolute Witness Anonymity and Rolling Disclosure Measures -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Terminology -- 3 Impact of the Pre-existing Qualification Clauses Affecting the Right to Cross-Examination on the Judicial Admission of Absolut -- 3.1 The ICTY and ICTR -- 3.2 The ICC -- 4 Emergence of a Justificatory Framework for Reviewing Implied External Limits on the Accused's Right to Cross-Examination -- 4.1 The ICTY and the Conditional Admission of Absolute Anonymity -- 4.1.1 The Tadić Protective Measures Decision -- 4.1.2 Reinforcement of the Conditions Laid Down in the Tadić Protective Measures Decision -- 4.1.3 Relaxation of the Conditions Set Forth in the Tadić Protective Measures Decision -- 4.1.4 Progressive Retreat from the Tadić Protective Measures Decision. |
505 8# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | 4.2 The ICTY's Judicial Admission of an Intermediary Form of Implied External Limit on the Accused's Right to Cross- Examination -- 4.3 The ICTR's Judicial Admission of Implied External Limits on the Accused's Right to Cross-Examination -- 4.3.1 Absence of Principled Position on the Validity of Absolute Anonymity Measures -- 4.3.2 The Judicial Endorsement of a Rolling Disclosure Mechanism -- 4.4 The ICC's Judicial Admission of Implied External Limits on the Accused's Right to Cross-Examination -- 4.4.1 Absence of Principled Position on the Validity of Absolute Anonymity Measures -- 4.4.2 Requests for Victim Anonymity -- 4.4.3 The Judicial Endorsement of a Rolling Disclosure Mechanism -- 5 The Legitimate Objective Requirement and the Presence of a Mixed Conflict of Values -- 5.1 Manifestation of the Underlying Conflict of Rights -- 5.2 Manifestation of a Conflict between a Human Right and a Public Interest Ground -- 6 Recognition of a Means-Test -- 6.1 Suitability Test -- 6.1.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 6.1.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 6.2 Less Restrictive Means Test -- 6.2.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 6.2.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 7 Mechanism of 'Practical Concordance' -- 7.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 7.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 8 Recognition of a Strict Proportionality Requirement -- 8.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 8.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 9 Failure of the Hierarchy of Rights Model to Capture the Judicial Rulings under Review from a Conflict of Rights Perspective -- 10 Adoption of a Teleological Method of Interpretation -- 10.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 10.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 11 Legal Uncertainty Generated by the Multiplicity of Justificatory Criteria -- 11.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law -- 11.2 Rolling Disclosure Case-Law -- 12 Influence of International Human Rights Law. |
505 8# - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
Formatted contents note | 12.1 Absolute Anonymity Case-Law. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The aim of this monograph is to analyze how international criminal courts /tribunals have resorted to proportionality and other limitation techniques when placing external limits upon the exercise of substantive and procedural human rights triggered by international criminal proceedings. |
588 ## - SOURCE OF DESCRIPTION NOTE | |
Source of description note | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. |
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
Local note | Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | International criminal law. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | Proportionality in law. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | International law and human rights. |
655 #4 - INDEX TERM--GENRE/FORM | |
Genre/form data or focus term | Electronic books. |
776 08 - ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL FORM ENTRY | |
Relationship information | Print version: |
Main entry heading | Croquet, Nicolas A. J. |
Title | The Role and Extent of a Proportionality Analysis in the Judicial Assessment of Human Rights Limitations Within International Criminal Proceedings |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | Boston : BRILL,c2015 |
International Standard Book Number | 9789004231429 |
797 2# - LOCAL ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME (RLIN) | |
Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element | ProQuest (Firm) |
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4397543">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/orpp/detail.action?docID=4397543</a> |
Public note | Click to View |
No items available.