Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles : A Study of Linguistic Variation in the Corpus Paulinum.

Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Tables -- List of Figures -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Part 1 The Linguistic Problem of the Pastoral Epistles -- Chapter 1 Origins of the Problem: Founding Figures -- 1.0 Introduction -- 1.1 E. Evanson -- 1.2 F. D. E. Schleiermacher -- 1.3 J. G. Eichhorn -- 1.4 H. J. Holtzmann -- 1.5 P. N. Harrison -- 1.6 Conclusion -- Chapter 2 Constituents of the Problem: Linguistic Peculiarities -- 2.0 Introduction -- 2.1 Peculiarities of Vocabulary -- 2.1.1 Hapax Legomena -- 2.1.2 Lexical Richness -- 2.1.3 Missing Indeclinables -- 2.1.4 Compound Words -- 2.1.5 Semantic Deviations -- 2.1.5.1 Grecisms -- 2.1.5.2 Un-Paulinisms -- 2.1.6 Summary -- 2.2 Peculiarities of Syntax -- 2.2.1 Interclausal Relations -- 2.2.2 Structural Irregularities -- 2.2.3 Miscellaneous Constructions -- 2.2.3.1 Ὡς -- 2.2.3.2 Articles -- 2.2.3.3 Prepositions -- 2.2.4 Stylometric Data -- 2.2.4.1 Univariate Statistics -- 2.2.4.2 Multivariate Statistics -- 2.2.5 Summary -- 2.3 Conclusion -- Chapter 3 Solutions to the Problem: Authorship Hypotheses -- 3.0 Introduction -- 3.1 Orthonymity Hypotheses -- 3.1.1 Paul -- 3.1.1.1 Statistical Fallacies -- 3.1.1.2 Derivative Words -- 3.1.1.3 Preformed Traditions -- 3.1.1.4 Age -- 3.1.1.5 Addressees -- 3.1.1.6 Subject Matter -- 3.1.1.7 Textuality (versus Orality) -- 3.1.1.8 Stylistic Adaptation -- 3.1.1.9 Register -- 3.1.2 Secretary -- 3.1.2.1 Luke -- 3.1.2.2 Tychicus -- 3.1.3 Summary -- 3.2 Pseudonymity Hypotheses -- 3.2.1 One Author -- 3.2.1.1 Luke -- 3.2.1.2 Timothy -- 3.2.1.3 Polycarp -- 3.2.2 Two Authors -- 3.2.3 Three Authors -- 3.2.4 Summary -- 3.3 Partial Orthonymity Hypotheses -- 3.3.1 Genuine Fragments -- 3.3.2 Second Timothy: A Genuine Letter -- 3.3.3 Second Timothy and Titus: Genuine Letters -- 3.3.4 Summary -- 3.4 Conclusion.

Part 2 The Linguistic Problem of the Pastoral Epistles Reconsidered -- Chapter 4 Approaching the Problem: Methodological Considerations -- 4.0 Introduction -- 4.1 Linguistic Criticism -- 4.2 Towards a Linguistic Analysis of the Corpus Paulinum -- 4.2.1 Authorship Model -- 4.2.1.1 Consistency Model -- 4.2.1.2 Resemblance Model -- 4.2.1.3 Population Model -- 4.2.2 Analytical Method -- 4.2.2.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 4.2.2.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 4.2.3 Possible Objections -- 4.2.3.1 Post-Pauline Interpolations? -- 4.2.3.2 Co-authors and/or Secretaries? -- 4.2.4 Summary -- 4.3 Conclusion -- Chapter 5 Pauline Vocabulary: New Perspectives -- 5.0 Introduction -- 5.1 Hapax Legomena -- 5.1.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 5.1.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 5.1.2.1 Quotations -- 5.1.2.2 Proper Nouns -- 5.1.2.3 Productivity -- 5.1.2.4 Age -- 5.1.3 Summary -- 5.2 Lexical Richness -- 5.2.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 5.2.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 5.2.2.1 Emotion -- 5.2.2.2 Age -- 5.2.2.3 Topic -- 5.2.2.4 Textuality (versus Orality) -- 5.2.3 Summary -- 5.3 Missing Indeclinables -- 5.3.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 5.3.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 5.3.2.1 Subjectivity -- 5.3.2.2 Emotion -- 5.3.2.3 Textuality (versus Orality) -- 5.3.3 Summary -- 5.4 Conclusion -- Chapter 6 Pauline Syntax: New Perspectives -- 6.0 Introduction -- 6.1 Interclausal Relations -- 6.1.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 6.1.1.1 Parataxis -- 6.1.1.2 Hypotaxis -- 6.1.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 6.1.2.1 Age -- 6.1.2.2 Textuality (versus Orality) -- 6.1.3 Summary -- 6.2 Structural Irregularities -- 6.2.1 Quantitative Analysis -- 6.2.1.1 Parentheses -- 6.2.1.2 Anacolutha -- 6.2.1.3 Ellipses -- 6.2.2 Qualitative Analysis -- 6.2.2.1 Emotion -- 6.2.2.2 Textuality (versus Orality) -- 6.2.3 Summary -- 6.3 Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Appendix 1 Hapax Legomena in the Corpus Paulinum.

Appendix 2 Lexical Richness in the Corpus Paulinum -- Appendix 3 Missing Indeclinables in the Corpus Paulinum -- Appendix 4 Interclausal Relations in the Corpus Paulinum -- Appendix 5 Structural Irregularities in the Corpus Paulinum -- Bibliography -- Index of Ancient Sources -- Index of Modern Authors.

In Pauline Language and the Pastoral Epistles, Jermo van Nes argues that the language of the so-called Pastoral Epistles is not significantly different from the other Pauline writings, and therefore should no longer be used as a criterion in discussions of their authorship.

Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.

Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2024. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries.